Teams

Pernici/40/4.5/WN/QTC

2026 Shrev-Boss Adult 40 & Over - Women Night · 4.5 Shrev

10 players · average NTRP 4.25 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-23vs Rubben/40/4.5/WN/POTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarla Hildebrand / Sheila Pernici vs Malini Howard / Margaret Elberson4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesTammy Cannon vs Anne Jenkins3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesStacy Haren / Leslie Stewart vs Kelly Stratton / Brandy Hayse6-2, 6-1
2026-03-22vs Rubben/40/4.5/WN/POTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesStacy Haren / Carla Hildebrand vs Donna Bryan / Jennifer Sutton7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesSheila Pernici vs Kelly Stratton6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCatherine Hardy / Tracy Elliott vs Margaret Elberson / Carolyn Bickham4-6, 4-6
2026-03-15vs Rubben/40/4.5/WN/POTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesSheila Pernici / Carla Hildebrand vs Tara Hammack / Carolyn Bickham2-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesTammy Cannon vs Kelly Stratton6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesStacy Haren / Rebekah Anzalone vs Jennifer Sutton / Margaret Elberson4-6, 6-7
2026-03-03vs Rubben/40/4.5/WN/POTCSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSheila Pernici / Carla Hildebrand vs Jennifer Sutton / Margaret Elberson5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTammy Cannon vs Anne Jenkins4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesStacy Haren / Leslie Stewart vs Brandy Hayse / Carolyn Bickham6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDonna McGee / Rebekah Anzalone vs Malini Howard / Donna Bryan6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2026-03-01vs Rubben/40/4.5/WN/POTCWon 31
W#1 DoublesLeslie Stewart / Stacy Haren vs Malini Howard / Kelly Stratton6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSheila Pernici vs Brandy Hayse7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTammy Cannon / Carla Hildebrand vs Jennifer Sutton / Donna Bryan6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDonna McGee / Rebekah Anzalone vs Tara Hammack / Anne Jenkins2-6, 4-6
2026-01-11vs Rubben/40/4.5/WN/POTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesStacy Haren / Carla Hildebrand vs Carolyn Bickham / Tara Hammack6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesRebekah Anzalone vs Brandy Hayse3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTammy Cannon / Donna McGee vs Jennifer Sutton / Margaret Elberson3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 Shrev
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Rubben/40/4.5/WN/POTC42141024214
2Pernici/40/4.5/WN/QTC24101430214

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.97 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Carla Hildebrand
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.19
Stacy Haren
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.08
Donna McGee
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.02
Sheila Pernici
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
4.02
Tammy Cannon
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
4.00
Rebekah Anzalone
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.82
Tracy Elliott
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.70
Grace Rogers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.65
Catherine Hardy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Laura Hogg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna McGee + Rebekah Anzalone4157% games−5.5% vs expected
Carla Hildebrand + Sheila Pernici5650% games−12.9% vs expected
Carla Hildebrand + Stacy Haren213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carla Hildebrand
19W–24L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
4.28
Stacy Haren
9W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
4.19
Donna McGee
13W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
4.08
Sheila Pernici
12W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
4.02
Tammy Cannon
20W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
4.02
Rebekah Anzalone
12W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
4.00
Tracy Elliott
41W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Grace Rogers
27W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
4
Catherine Hardy
13W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
14%86%1%
3.65
Laura Hogg
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.