Teams

2023 18&Over- Caguas Stephanie

Adult 18 & Over 2023 · 2023 18 & Over Women 2.5 III

9 players · average NTRP 2.75 / PUERTO RICO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-01vs 2023 18&Over- Caguas RafaelLost 01
L#1 DoublesAstrid Landron / ADA CAROLINA CUEVAS LANDRON vs Mariana Emmanuelli / Rosemarie Diaz3-6, 2-6
2023-06-17vs 2023 18&Over- Guayama Ruth RosarioLost 01
L#1 DoublesAstrid Landron / Maria Planas vs Karla Michelle Ledee Ramirez / Nissette Rodriguez6-7, 1-6
2023-06-10vs 2023 18&Over- Guayama Ruth RosarioSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAnabel Polanco / Anais Rios vs Ana Milian / Barbara Ruttell6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Polanco / Astrid Landron vs Diana Rodriguez / Nissette Rodriguez5-7, 4-6
2023-06-03vs 2023 18&Over- OrroLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnabel Polanco / Grace Mercado vs Maria I Ortiz / Arantza Gonzalez Gomez3-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesGlenda Medina Rios / Stephanie Polanco vs Ruth Rosario / Diana Rodriguez6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnabel Polanco / Anais Rios vs Karla Michelle Ledee Ramirez / Sofia Frau Rivera6-3, 6-3
2023-05-17vs 2023 18&Over- OrroWon 10
W#2 DoublesAstrid Landron / Grace Mercado vs Gladys Girona Lozada / Yamila Ramirez4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-04-29vs 2023 18&Over- OrroSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAnabel Polanco / Grace Mercado vs Kirsis Garcia / Veronica Matos de Jesus3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesAnais Rios / Glenda Medina Rios vs Yamila Ramirez / Gladys Girona Lozada6-3, 6-1
2023-04-22vs 2023 18&Over- Caguas RafaelLost 01
L#1 DoublesGlenda Medina Rios / Astrid Landron vs Grecia Gonzalez / Mariana Emmanuelli5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2023 18 & Over Women 2.5 III have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.47 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.80
Anabel Polanco
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Anais Rios
published 3
2.65
2.63
Glenda Medina Rios
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.28
Maria Planas
published
Grace Mercado
published 2.5
2.25
Denise Gonzalez
published 2.5
2.21
Astrid Landron
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Stephanie Polanco
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Polanco + Anabel Polanco4359% games+15.6% vs expected
Astrid Landron + Glenda Medina Rios1739% games−3.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Anabel Polanco
29W–14L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Anais Rios
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Wilmarys Lopez Almedina
15W–20L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Glenda Medina Rios
27W–40L career · 3 lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
2.63
Maria Planas
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
96%4%<1%
2.28
2.5
Grace Mercado
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Denise Gonzalez
11W–22L career · no lines in 2023
0%97%3%
2.25
2.5
Astrid Landron
24W–45L career · 5 lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.21
Stephanie Polanco
15W–18L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.