Teams

Scott/18s/7.5/FAC

2025 Man · Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Carolyn Kalman
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.54
Charlotte Scott
usually #3 Doubles 37%, also #1 Doubles 37% · published 4
3.46
Debra Ethridge
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Erika Rase
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Jana Phillippi
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Kelley Guidry
published
Lisa Keiffer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Melanie Cook
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Michaela Franklin
usually #3 Doubles 30%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Pamela Layton
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Rhonda Eckholdt
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 42% · published
Shelley Sisson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Wendy Morise
usually #3 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carolyn Kalman + Charlotte Scott4164% gamesnot enough data
Carolyn Kalman + Debra Ethridge134 matchesnot enough data
Erika Rase + Wendy Morise303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carolyn Kalman
18W–15L career · 14 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Charlotte Scott
23W–11L career · 19 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54
4
Debra Ethridge
9W–12L career · 8 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.46
Erika Rase
8W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jana Phillippi
11W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelley Guidry
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Keiffer
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Melanie Cook
4W–15L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michaela Franklin
11W–15L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Pamela Layton
1W–11L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rhonda Eckholdt
30W–23L career · 24 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shelley Sisson
8W–4L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Wendy Morise
10W–7L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.