Teams

Ponte Vedra - Egan

2021 Duval Adult 18 & Over - Women · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-07-03vs Boone Park - HarrisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJill Saig / Julie van Voorhis vs Katie Deering / Kelly Risdon6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJoann Welborn vs Stephanie Vihlen1-6, 3-6
2021-06-26vs Oakleaf - LooneyLost 03
L#1 DoublesMargaret Desaussure / Heather LaPrade vs Cindy Bleiel / Darlene Turner2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesJacqueline Bell Egan vs Arzikia Curry4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJoann Welborn vs Kimberly Jackson3-6, 1-6
2021-06-19vs Latta-RainesWon 20
W#1 DoublesJulie van Voorhis / Margaret Desaussure vs Michelle Jahn / Temeka Perry6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJacqueline Bell Egan / Stacie Nicandri vs Julia Richardson / Vanessa Viera6-4, 6-3
2021-06-12vs Baymeadows - LansangSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJill Saig / Julie van Voorhis vs Deidra Radel / Lindsay Toth6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJacqueline Bell Egan vs Cameryn Hartong6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesHeather LaPrade / Kathy Hawkins vs Courtney Luffler / Amanda Swearingen1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesJoann Welborn vs Cecilia Collins0-6, 0-6
2021-06-05vs Duval - Williams Y - ClarkLost 12
W#1 DoublesJill Saig / Julie van Voorhis vs Loretta Zubero / Victoria Li6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJacqueline Bell Egan vs Gina Carman6-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJoann Welborn vs Carolina Rechy1-6, 0-6
2021-05-29vs Boone Park - HarrisWon 21
W#1 DoublesMargaret Desaussure / Heather LaPrade vs Shea Zahner / Lani Baruch2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJacqueline Bell Egan vs Katie Deering6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesJoann Welborn vs Cynthia Haines2-6, 3-6
2021-05-22vs Oakleaf - LooneySplit 11
L#1 DoublesHeather LaPrade / Julie van Voorhis vs Darlene Turner / Cindy Bleiel6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Bell Egan / Stacie Nicandri vs Ruth Jones-Looney / Judibelle Roman6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2021-05-15vs Latta-RainesWon 30
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Bell Egan / Betsy McNeill vs Michelle Jahn / Brenda Huynh6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMargaret Desaussure / Heather LaPrade vs Julie Palus / Polly Curole6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJoann Welborn vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-05-08vs Baymeadows - LansangWon 20
W#1 DoublesJill Saig / Julie van Voorhis vs Amanda Swearingen / Courtney Luffler7-5, 6-3
W#2 SinglesJacqueline Bell Egan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-05-01vs Duval - Williams Y - ClarkSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDonna Bush - (DQ)* / Heather LaPrade vs Loretta Zubero / Andrea Frick7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJacqueline Bell Egan vs Carolina Rechy3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJoann Welborn vs Rachel Kennedy3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesStacie Nicandri / Julie van Voorhis vs Victoria Li / Kelly Atkins3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Joan Whelan
published
4.33
Jill Saig
published
3.91
Jacqueline Bell Egan
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #2 Singles 11% · published 4
3.87
Donna Bush
published 4
3.86
Julie van Voorhis
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
3.85
Betsy McNeill
published 4
3.81
Heather LaPrade
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
Kathy Parker
published
3.77
Pamela Alpert
published
3.77
Jayne Coffing
published
3.66
Joann Welborn
usually #2 Singles 86%, also #1 Singles 14% · published
Margaret Desaussure
published
Stacie Nicandri
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacqueline Bell Egan + Julie van Voorhis5063% games+3.8% vs expected
Jacqueline Bell Egan + Heather LaPrade9852% games+3.5% vs expected
Jacqueline Bell Egan + Joann Welborn2553% gamesnot enough data
Joann Welborn + Julie van Voorhis4155% gamesnot enough data
Joann Welborn + Heather LaPrade213 matchesnot enough data
Jayne Coffing + Donna Bush213 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Parker + Pamela Alpert303 matchesnot enough data
Donna Bush + Pamela Alpert213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joan Whelan
7W–2L career · no lines in 2021
<1%72%28%
4.42
Jill Saig
35W–5L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%9%
4.33
4
Jacqueline Bell Egan
145W–100L career · 8 lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Donna Bush
8W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%84%16%
3.87
Julie van Voorhis
45W–19L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Betsy McNeill
6W–2L career · no lines in 2021
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Heather LaPrade
101W–76L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.81
Kathy Parker
6W–2L career · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.78
Pamela Alpert
8W–3L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
Jayne Coffing
5W–6L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
Joann Welborn
50W–46L career · 7 lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
3.66
Margaret Desaussure
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Stacie Nicandri
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.