Teams

Mullens/VB/CM

2025 Adult Singles · 2.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-02-13vs Marcotte/FS/HOWon 21
L#1 SinglesMarcela Escobar vs Emily Humphrey3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesBlanca Barroso vs Kristey Taake6-4, 6-1
W#3 SinglesWendy Mullens vs Whitney Marcotte6-3, 6-0
2026-02-05vs Wilkins/FS/CMWon 20
W#1 SinglesJenny Wilkerson vs Angelica Hernandez6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesBlanca Barroso vs Sally Bracken6-2, 6-1
2026-01-22vs Knoll/FS/CMWon 20
W#2 SinglesMarcela Escobar vs Savannah Selman6-0, 6-1
W#3 SinglesSharon Guzman vs Sara Carroll7-5, 6-4
2026-01-08vs Knoll/FS/CMWon 20
W#1 SinglesMarcela Escobar vs Michelle Greenfield6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesSharon Guzman vs Sara Carroll6-1, 6-2
2025-12-18vs Wilkins/FS/CMSplit 11
W#1 SinglesBlanca Barroso vs Kailyn Smith6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesMarcela Escobar vs Angelica Hernandez2-6, 2-6
2025-12-11vs Knoll/FS/CMWon 20
W#1 SinglesBlanca Barroso vs Emily Knoll6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesWendy Mullens vs Candyce Gabucci6-0, 6-0
2025-12-04vs Wilkins/FS/CMWon 21
L#1 SinglesJenny Wilkerson vs Angelica Hernandez6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMarcela Escobar vs Madelyn Sturgill6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesBlanca Barroso vs Stacy Seeger6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2025-11-19vs Marcotte/FS/HOWon 21
L#1 SinglesMarcela Escobar vs Emily Humphrey6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJenny Wilkerson vs Erin Barker6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesSharon Guzman vs Whitney Marcotte6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2025-11-13vs Marcotte/FS/HOWon 20
W#1 SinglesMarcela Escobar vs Kristey Taake6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesBlanca Barroso vs Whitney Marcotte6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.31 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.50
Marcela Escobar
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 42% · published
2.45
Jenny Wilkerson
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.39
Blanca Barroso
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Emma Robertson
published 2.5
2.16
Wendy Mullens
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.05
Sharon Guzman
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emma Robertson + Wendy Mullens2448% games+5.9% vs expected
Blanca Barroso + Wendy Mullens044 matchesnot enough data
Sharon Guzman + Wendy Mullens213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marcela Escobar
25W–15L career · 12 lines in 2025
0%51%49%
2.50
Jenny Wilkerson
19W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.45
2.5
Blanca Barroso
21W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%80%20%
2.39
2.5
Emma Robertson
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Wendy Mullens
19W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.16
Sharon Guzman
14W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.