Teams

Refunds

2024 Adult 40 & Over League · Refunds

17 players · average NTRP 3.57 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Refunds have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Anthony Lasala
published 4
3.71
Arlene Conger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Laura Cass
published
3.50
Peter Sofarelli
published 3.5
3.39
Madeleine Glover
published
3.35
Mark Fiddes
published
3.34
Mike Ferguson
published
3.25
Catherine Rousseaux
published 3.5
3.18
Aaron Backus
published 3.5
3.11
Marcie Elaasar
published
3.10
Vickie Koskinas
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Shannon Lind
published 3
2.93
Meghan Lay
published
2.85
Michele Kelly
published
2.79
Scarlet Grindle
published
2.34
Pamela Quinn
published
Melissa Leisure
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scarlet Grindle + Vickie Koskinas224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anthony Lasala
35W–20L career · type A · no lines in 2024
<1%9%91%
4.19
4
Arlene Conger
71W–48L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.71
Laura Cass
40W–35L career · no lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Peter Sofarelli
86W–48L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.50
Madeleine Glover
17W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
Mark Fiddes
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
Mike Ferguson
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
87%13%<1%
3.34
3.5
Catherine Rousseaux
19W–13L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Aaron Backus
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Marcie Elaasar
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Vickie Koskinas
99W–104L career · 3 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.10
3
Shannon Lind
49W–40L career · no lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
3.05
Meghan Lay
9W–3L career · no lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
2.93
Michele Kelly
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
2.85
Scarlet Grindle
103W–60L career · no lines in 2024
93%7%<1%
2.79
Pamela Quinn
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
2.34
Melissa Leisure
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.