Teams

Herbert/Sheridan/BP

2024 Singles 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-01-25vs Crowder/NLR/LakewoodLost 03
L#1 SinglesKarla Karwoski vs Leah Welker4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesMarda Isbell vs Regina Maher2-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesSara Jennings vs Briana Crowder1-6, 1-6
2024-12-19vs Bledsoe/LR/PVCCWon 21
L#1 SinglesSara Jennings vs Julie Miller1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesMarda Isbell vs Amanda Bledsoe6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesAmy Ross vs Annie Hogate6-1, 6-4
2024-12-11vs Rutledge/LR/RebWon 21
W#1 SinglesRebecca Roden vs Lisa Hunt6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMelissa Herbert vs Eliza Meredith6-0, 6-1
L#3 SinglesSara Jennings vs Sarah Gold4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-12-03vs Anthony/LR/CCLRLost 12
L#1 SinglesAmy Ross vs Mary Nell McBryde6-4, 2-6
L#2 SinglesKarla Karwoski vs Allison Anthony6-7, 3-6
W#3 SinglesMarda Isbell vs Rachel Sims6-1, 6-2
2024-11-13vs Laureano/NLR/BPWon 30
W#1 SinglesMelissa Herbert vs Christi Callaway2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKirby Wells vs Joyce Adame4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 SinglesAmy Ross vs Florencia Bruzatori6-4, 6-0
2024-11-05vs Adkins/LR/PVCCLost 03
L#1 SinglesRebecca Roden vs Gracie Bailey1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesKarla Karwoski vs Stefan Jones5-7, 4-6
L#3 SinglesMarda Isbell vs Lanie Driver1-6, 2-6
2024-10-28vs Miller/LR/BPWon 21
W#1 SinglesKirby Wells vs Martina Davis6-0, 6-2
L#2 SinglesSara Jennings vs Sarah Rolfes1-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesAmy Ross vs Jasmine Black7-5, 2-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.52 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Rebecca Roden
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.69
Karla Karwoski
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.66
Amy Ross
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.24
Sara Jennings
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.08
Melissa Herbert
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Kirby Wells
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Marda Isbell
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebecca Roden
18W–10L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%71%28%
2.93
Karla Karwoski
23W–13L career · 6 lines in 2024
0%7%93%
2.69
3
Amy Ross
16W–21L career · 4 lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
2.66
Sara Jennings
6W–23L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.24
Melissa Herbert
8W–29L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Kirby Wells
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Marda Isbell
4W–6L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.