Teams

BVP NAVY

2023 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - DAYTIME

8 players · average NTRP 3.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-22vs LEBTC BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesDeborah Freischlag / Fenny Evers vs Tiffany Gerken / Kelly Lessman6-3, 6-3
2023-06-15vs NJ REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesBobbie Lutz / Cara Phillips vs Jessica Mitchell / Suzanne Watkins6-4, 6-4
2023-06-08vs KC-RH NAVYWon 20
W#1 DoublesBobbie Lutz / Dorothy Monroe vs Janelle Coughran / Meghan Geisler4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesFenny Evers / Deborah Freischlag vs Kerry Anders / Meg Yarka6-4, 6-1
2023-06-01vs NJ BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesDorothy Monroe / Fenny Evers vs Angela Harper / Diana Guettlein6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCara Phillips / Bobbie Lutz vs Diana Beck / Diane Waldron6-4, 6-2
2023-05-25vs PH GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTaylor Carney / Bobbie Lutz vs Christin Johnson / Melodie Harris2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesFenny Evers / Dorothy Monroe vs Karen Calderone / Rebecca Grace6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2023-05-18Won 20
W#1 DoublesBobbie Lutz / Cara Phillips vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesFenny Evers / Taylor Carney vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-11Won 10
W#1 DoublesBobbie Lutz / Cara Phillips vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Taylor Carney
published
3.69
Cara Phillips
published 4
3.66
Natalie Bailey
published
3.65
Bobbie Lutz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.53
Dorothy Monroe
published
3.48
Fenny Evers
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
2.94
Deborah Freischlag
published 3.5
Tamra Scaturro
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natalie Bailey + Cara Phillips224 matchesnot enough data
Bobbie Lutz + Taylor Carney314 matchesnot enough data
Cara Phillips + Dorothy Monroe044 matchesnot enough data
Natalie Bailey + Dorothy Monroe123 matchesnot enough data
Bobbie Lutz + Fenny Evers123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Taylor Carney
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Cara Phillips
21W–15L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
Natalie Bailey
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Bobbie Lutz
109W–67L career · 6 lines in 2023
14%86%1%
3.65
Dorothy Monroe
4W–17L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.53
4
Fenny Evers
46W–43L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
Deborah Freischlag
8W–36L career · no lines in 2023
67%33%<1%
2.94
Tamra Scaturro
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.