Teams

FC: Game Changers/Scott/Clark

2025 RI Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

14 players · average NTRP 3.61 / RHODE ISLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-27vs RP: Curry/DePalmaWon 21
L#1 DoublesIra de Rijke / Domino Difilippo vs Michelle Gries / Jeff Mcvay3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Carrison / Alexander Scott vs Katie Wetherby / Nicholas Leso6-3, 4-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLauren Schaller / Mark Steketee vs Jennifer Leite / Christopher Mulvey6-7, 7-5, 3-1
2025-04-26vs EB: O'KeefeLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlexander Scott / Ira de Rijke vs Alice Kim / Joe Gagliardi4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMark Steketee / Elizabeth Carrison vs Leo Garceau / Kim Andersen7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAngel MacLeod / Federico Read vs Chris Munoz / Shannon Passarelli6-7, 6-2, 1-5
2025-04-06vs RP: Curry/DePalmaWon 30
W#1 DoublesLauren Schaller / Alex Bourque vs Michelle Gries / Russell Kassatly7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Carrison / Mark Steketee vs Jennifer Leite / Justin Wetherby6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesIra de Rijke / Domino Difilippo vs Renee Rousselle / Frank Chin6-1, 6-4
2025-03-30vs EB: O'KeefeWon 21
W#1 DoublesLauren Schaller / Cesar Fernandes vs Lidia Pierce / Son Nguyen6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesIra de Rijke / Domino Difilippo vs Chris Munoz / Kim Andersen6-4, 4-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesTheresa Pereira / Alexander Scott vs Alice Kim / Joe Gagliardi3-6, 4-6
2025-03-29vs HOF: MillerLost 12
L#1 DoublesIra de Rijke / Domino Difilippo vs Joshua Bell / Cathy Davis4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesFederico Read / Angel MacLeod vs Clare Okeefe / Robert Goldstein2-6, 6-3, 5-6
W#3 DoublesAlexander Scott / Elizabeth Carrison vs Alison Daigle / Charles Albrecht7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2025-03-23vs HOF: MillerWon 21
L#1 DoublesLauren Schaller / Alex Bourque vs Katie Tingley / Hayden Miller2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Carrison / Mark Steketee vs Zoe Kelliher / Charles Albrecht6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesIra de Rijke / Domino Difilippo vs Erica Doran / Joshua Bell6-4, 6-1
2025-03-16vs RP: Joan SteereWon 21
L#1 DoublesIra de Rijke / Domino Difilippo vs Alexander McCarthy / Christina Falcon3-6, 7-6, 0-4
W#2 DoublesTheresa Pereira / Alexander Scott vs Katherine Linton / Gael Frouin3-6, 6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSusan Clark / Mark Steketee vs Tony Rogers / Sandra O'Leary6-4, 3-6, 6-0
2025-02-16vs RP: Joan SteereWon 30
W#1 DoublesIra de Rijke / Domino Difilippo vs James Mitchell / Anna Kyriakides6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAlexander Scott / Elizabeth Carrison vs Andrew Miller / MacKenzie Silveira7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMark Steketee / Angel MacLeod vs David Robertson / Deborah Robertson4-6, 6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Cesar Fernandes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Alex Bourque
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
Elizabeth Carrison
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.71
Theresa Pereira
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.56
Ira de Rijke
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.48
Mark Steketee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.34
John Schaller
published
3.31
Domino Difilippo
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.28
Lauren Schaller
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Angel MacLeod
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Federico Read
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
2.91
Christopher Alger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.90
Alexander Scott
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Susan Clark
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ira de Rijke + Domino Difilippo4352% games+8.6% vs expected
Angel MacLeod + Alexander Scott123 matchesnot enough data
Alexander Scott + Elizabeth Carrison303 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Carrison + Mark Steketee303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cesar Fernandes
36W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Alex Bourque
24W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Elizabeth Carrison
33W–19L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Theresa Pereira
10W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Ira de Rijke
35W–36L career · 8 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
Mark Steketee
18W–3L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.48
John Schaller
6W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Domino Difilippo
24W–13L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.31
Lauren Schaller
33W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Angel MacLeod
44W–43L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Federico Read
49W–97L career · 7 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.13
3
Christopher Alger
28W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Alexander Scott
55W–50L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Susan Clark
17W–27L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.