Teams

BERKELEY TC 55AW9.0A

2023 ADULT 55&Over · Women 9.0

18 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.71
Blair Paige
published 5
4.55
Kathleen Haigood
published
4.18
Helen Potter
published
4.15
Malaika Stoll
published
4.11
Kate Silverness
published
4.09
Anita Kressner
published 4.5
4.08
Cynthia Abel
published 4.5
4.02
Kathy Wei
published
3.94
Marcia Banks
published
3.85
Susan Junfish
published
3.78
Jo Baker
published
3.72
Molly Brostrom
published
3.70
Carrie Portis
published 4
3.68
Kathleen Heinze
published
3.42
Jennifer Leebove
published
3.38
Erika Smith
published
Karen Spinardi
published
Kim Lackey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anita Kressner + Molly Brostrom123 matchesnot enough data
Molly Brostrom + Kate Silverness213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Blair Paige
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.71
Kathleen Haigood
9W–2L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.55
Helen Potter
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
9%89%1%
4.18
Malaika Stoll
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%1%
4.15
Kate Silverness
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
4.11
4.5
Anita Kressner
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
4.09
4.5
Cynthia Abel
19W–10L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
4.08
Kathy Wei
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
4.02
Marcia Banks
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
3.94
Susan Junfish
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%15%
3.85
Jo Baker
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
94%6%<1%
3.78
Molly Brostrom
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
98%2%<1%
3.72
4
Carrie Portis
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.70
Kathleen Heinze
13W–10L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Jennifer Leebove
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
3.42
Erika Smith
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
3.38
Karen Spinardi
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kim Lackey
5W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.