Teams

Crawford - Court Chaos

2024 Shenandoah Adult 40 & Over Weekday Women · Shenandoah Adult 40 & Over Weekday 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-19vs CampbellWon 20
W#2 DoublesIngrid Hunsicker / Katherine Grady vs Mary Ashton / Jennifer Seven6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLynn Koggan / Nancy Gatti vs Jane Kim / Terri Diley6-2, 6-2
2024-07-12Won 20
W#1 DoublesSue Nilsson / Dalyah Ronzio vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLynn Koggan / Nancy Gatti vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-01vs Messner - Watch Your Face!Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSue Nilsson / Dalyah Ronzio vs Susan Cooke / Jill Adler2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesIngrid Hunsicker vs Jennifer Schneider4-6, 4-4
2024-06-28vs CampbellSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRita Romano / Lynn Koggan vs Deborah Williams / Kristin Gibbs3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesIngrid Hunsicker / Katherine Grady vs Laura Paddock / Christina White6-3, 7-6
2024-06-21vs FurgalSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSue Nilsson / Dalyah Ronzio vs Ursula Cox / Devika Eddula0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLynn Koggan / Nancy Gatti vs Anne McDonald / Christiane Lavin4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-06-14vs Connell - WCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesLynn Koggan / Lori Papuga vs Rhonda Madison / Mary Lou Daylor1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesIngrid Hunsicker vs Rachel Hahn4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDalyah Ronzio / Sue Nilsson vs Julia Connell / Christine Scully6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Shenandoah Adult 40 & Over Weekday 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Dalyah Ronzio
published 3
2.90
Tracy Crawford
published
2.84
Ingrid Hunsicker
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.80
Sue Nilsson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.76
Nancy Gatti
published
2.75
Lynn Koggan
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Brenda Burleson
published 3
2.60
Lori Papuga
published
Kristin Quinn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dalyah Ronzio + Tracy Crawford3252% games+3.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Dalyah Ronzio
6W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
2.92
Tracy Crawford
6W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Ingrid Hunsicker
111W–174L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Sue Nilsson
85W–147L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
2.80
Nancy Gatti
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Lynn Koggan
35W–54L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.75
3
Brenda Burleson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lori Papuga
3W–12L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
2.60
Kristin Quinn
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.