Teams

*7-SNarayan-CHTC

2024 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 4.5 Men Weekend

12 players · average NTRP 4.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-21vs *2-RBerliner-EnoLost 01
L#3 DoublesJake Wolfe / Boyd Blackburn vs Benjamin Albright / Sergii Porokh2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-04-20vs *6-SLlewellyn-ENO-4.5Lost 01
L#2 SinglesBoyd Blackburn vs Rawle Sue-Ho6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-04-15vs *8-RMcClenny-EnoLost 01
L#3 DoublesBoyd Blackburn / Chris Giordano vs Patrick Newsome / Parker Sheridan5-7, 4-6
2024-04-13vs *5-MHanauer-EnoLost 01
L#2 DoublesBoyd Blackburn / Chris Giordano vs Patrick Shields / Parv Mital1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-04-06vs *1-EAnderson-DFCLost 01
L#1 DoublesBoyd Blackburn / John Pelphrey vs Edmund Malesky / Jay Goldstein2-6, 6-7
2024-03-30vs *3-JByrd-EnoLost 01
L#3 DoublesBoyd Blackburn / Ty Bullard vs Brett Eckles / Ryan Lewis2-6, 4-6
2024-03-16vs *4-KMoyung-EnoLost 01
L#3 DoublesBoyd Blackburn / Kyle Couch vs Kevin Moyung / Michael Weslander6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 4.5 Men Weekend have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Todd Resly
published
4.27
Sravan Narayan
published
4.26
Geoffrey Vollman
published
4.21
Casey Black
published 4.5
4.13
Erik J Erikson
published
4.07
John Pelphrey
published
4.06
Matt Piland
published
4.03
Boyd Blackburn
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
4.01
Kyle Couch
published
3.82
Chris Giordano
published 4
3.75
Ty Bullard
published
Scott Benson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matt Piland + Kyle Couch123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Todd Resly
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%13%
4.34
Sravan Narayan
20W–4L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
4.27
Geoffrey Vollman
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
4.26
4.5
Casey Black
15W–8L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.21
Erik J Erikson
23W–9L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
4.13
John Pelphrey
6W–9L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
4.07
Matt Piland
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
4.06
4.5
Boyd Blackburn
110W–117L career · 7 lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
4.03
Kyle Couch
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
4.01
4
Chris Giordano
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
Ty Bullard
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.75
Scott Benson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.