Teams

Park Fit Club-All Mixed Up

2024 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-07-28vs PC-Crash-n-SmashWon 30
W#1 DoublesRamona Higashi / Joshua Cantu vs Maria Uy / John Smoot6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKelli Geris / Robert Pinon vs Kristi Dawson / Bart Munson6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLaura Temby / Kevin Collins vs Erica Clontz / Roman Gavino6-4, 6-1
2024-07-28vs PC-Happy HourLost 12
L#1 DoublesLaura Temby / Robert Pinon vs Don Donais / Joyce Donais4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRamona Higashi / Joshua Cantu vs Dana Holle / Ken Holle5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKelli Geris / Joseph Lenti vs Randy Gable / Midori Nyby7-6, 6-0
2024-07-27vs IND-Sets MachineLost 12
W#1 DoublesKelli Geris / Joseph Lenti vs Danny Anslinger / Michelle Anslinger6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Temby / Kevin Collins vs Tim Arbogast / Michele Beaman3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRamona Higashi / Joshua Cantu vs Danny Sanchez / Erika Wilson5-7, 0-6
2024-07-27vs EW-PC-BROOKSLost 03
L#1 DoublesKelli Geris / Joseph Lenti vs Lisa Smith / Anthony Smith0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRamona Higashi / Robert Pinon vs Tina Duncan / Cory Brooks2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Temby / Kevin Collins vs Stacey Neal / Morgan Neal3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EW-PC-BROOKS40120160
2IND-Sets Machine316613111
3PC-Happy Hour226612110
4Park Fit Club-All Mixed Up135714117
5PC-Crash-n-Smash0411122138

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Kelli Geris
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Joseph Lenti
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Joshua Cantu
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kevin Collins
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Laura Temby
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Ramona Higashi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Robert Pinon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joshua Cantu + Ramona Higashi4248% games−1.7% vs expected
Kelli Geris + Joseph Lenti3253% gamesnot enough data
Laura Temby + Kevin Collins2352% gamesnot enough data
Ramona Higashi + Joseph Lenti303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kelli Geris
63W–35L career · 4 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.60
Joseph Lenti
17W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Joshua Cantu
17W–33L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kevin Collins
29W–52L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Laura Temby
78W–51L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ramona Higashi
28W–12L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Robert Pinon
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.