Teams

Cardinals 55+

2025 OKCAdult 55 & Over League · 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / OKLAHOMA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-22vs AllenLost 12
L#1 DoublesJames Rainey / Martin Thee vs Tommy Hand / Heath Haley6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKelly Bishop / Tim Bostick vs Gary Bryant / RICHARD DAVIS6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesGreg Morrison / Michael Calhoun vs Eric Nazim / Ernesto Lang5-7, 4-6
2025-05-17vs AllenLost 03
L#1 DoublesJames Sieber / Josh Sieber vs Leroy Cantrell / Ernesto Lang3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Calhoun / Martin Thee vs Axelson Jorque / Mark Hybers2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJames Barrett / Tim Bostick vs Eric Nazim / Gary Bryant1-6, 2-6
2025-05-15vs OK/Thagard-Lueck/55&over7.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn Cox / Michael Calhoun vs Kevin Clark / Ramana Gudapati3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJames Sieber / Josh Sieber vs Mark Shuck / Michael Thagard0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJames Rainey / Martin Thee vs Timothy Wallace / Fred Phillips6-3, 6-3
2025-05-01vs AllenLost 03
L#1 DoublesJosh Sieber / James Sieber vs Kirk Purnell / Tommy Hand2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJames Barrett / Tim Bostick vs Will Allen / Eric Nazim2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMartin Thee / David Stewart vs Axelson Jorque / Mark Hybers0-6, 1-6
2025-04-25vs OK/Thagard-Lueck/55&over7.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesJames Rainey / Michael Calhoun vs Fred Lueck / Marc McClanahan6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJohn Cox / David Stewart vs Scott Munday / Gaines Ballew3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesGreg Morrison / Tim Bostick vs Mark Shuck / Michael Thagard4-6, 2-6
2025-04-24vs OK/Thagard-Lueck/55&over7.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesJames Sieber / Josh Sieber vs William Pearson / Timothy Wallace6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJames Rainey / Tim Bostick vs Mark Shuck / Michael Thagard3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJohn Cox / Michael Calhoun vs Scott Munday / Marc McClanahan2-6, 2-6
2025-04-11vs OK/Thagard-Lueck/55&over7.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesKelly Bishop / Greg Morrison vs Fred Lueck / Marc McClanahan2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Cox / Michael Wiens vs Olivier Bouzerand / Fred Phillips4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJames Sieber / Josh Sieber vs Mark Shuck / Michael Thagard0-6, 0-6
2025-04-10vs AllenSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJames Rainey / Martin Thee vs Eric Nazim / Tommy Hand6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKelly Bishop / Greg Morrison vs Leroy Cantrell / Kirk Purnell3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OK/Thagard-Lueck/55&over7.0M8019514172
2Allen35131122205
3Cardinals 55+1742041270

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Kelly Bishop
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.25
Greg Morrison
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.13
James Rainey
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.08
Martin Thee
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.06
Tim Bostick
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.03
David Stewart
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.85
Michael Calhoun
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
James Barrett
published
James Sieber
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
John Cox
published
Josh Sieber
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Michael Wiens
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Rainey + Martin Thee81250% games+3.3% vs expected
Tim Bostick + Michael Calhoun81050% games+1.7% vs expected
Tim Bostick + James Rainey2346% gamesnot enough data
Tim Bostick + Greg Morrison3249% gamesnot enough data
James Sieber + Josh Sieber0526% gamesnot enough data
Michael Calhoun + Michael Wiens1442% gamesnot enough data
Tim Bostick + Michael Wiens123 matchesnot enough data
Michael Calhoun + Martin Thee033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Bishop
81W–55L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Greg Morrison
65W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25
James Rainey
40W–89L career · 5 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Martin Thee
50W–74L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.08
Tim Bostick
50W–51L career · 5 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
David Stewart
22W–50L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.03
Michael Calhoun
37W–83L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
James Barrett
9W–18L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
James Sieber
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
John Cox
16W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Josh Sieber
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Wiens
32W–41L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.