Teams

FK Mosteller 65+ 6.0

2025 Marion Adult 65 & Over · 6.0 Adult Women 65 & Over

10 players · average NTRP / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-09vs Marion/Greene/65&Over6.0WWon 10
W#2 DoublesOlga Mosteller / Marisa McLeod vs Jody Nielsen / CARMEL CONNOR6-4, 6-2
2025-03-02vs Marion/Greene/65&Over6.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarisa McLeod / Olga Mosteller vs Margie McLellan / Ellen Smith3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-02-23vs Marion/Greene/65&Over6.0WWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarisa McLeod / Olga Mosteller vs Cindy Voigt / Deborah Franklin2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-02-16vs Marion/Greene/65&Over6.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesWanda Cross / Patricia Lamell vs Deborah Franklin / Mary Stevens3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPriscilla Stanley / Donna Schafer vs Janet Greene / Debby McCoy0-6, 0-6
2025-02-09vs Marion/Greene/65&Over6.0WWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarisa McLeod / Olga Mosteller vs Cindy Voigt / Ellen Smith7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-02-02vs Marion/Greene/65&Over6.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesWanda Cross / Linda Sheehan vs Joan Matlock / Jody Nielsen3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesEmily Speaker / Judith Lavendar vs Janet Snider / Mary Stevens0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMelinda Hartline / Olga Mosteller vs Janet Greene / Debby McCoy1-6, 1-6
2025-01-26vs Marion/Greene/65&Over6.0WWon 10
W#2 DoublesMarisa McLeod / Olga Mosteller vs Laura Roberson / Joan Matlock6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Adult Women 65 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Melinda Hartline
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Linda Sheehan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Wanda Cross
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Nancy Binko
published
2.04
Donna Schafer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Emily Speaker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Judith Lavendar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Marisa McLeod
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Olga Mosteller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Patricia Lamell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melinda Hartline
11W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
Linda Sheehan
7W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Wanda Cross
9W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
2.70
Nancy Binko
4W–15L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
2.65
Donna Schafer
6W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Emily Speaker
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Judith Lavendar
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Marisa McLeod
81W–60L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Olga Mosteller
9W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Lamell
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.