Teams

Waddle 4.0 Singles

2026 South East Tennis Singles 18 & Over League · 4.0 Women 18 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Women 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Elizabeth Claus
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
3.79
Jenna Stachowiak
published
3.76
Taylor Waddle
published
Caitlyn Stogner
published 4
3.67
Carolyn Noto
published 4
3.49
Brie Pettid
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.48
Julia Mattingly
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.24
Britt LaValley
published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Claus
35W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.90
Jenna Stachowiak
8W–1L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
Taylor Waddle
38W–7L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Caitlyn Stogner
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Carolyn Noto
9W–7L career · no lines in 2026
12%88%1%
3.67
3.5
Brie Pettid
24W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.49
Julia Mattingly
57W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.48
3.5
Britt LaValley
4W–7L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.