Teams

Laredo 2.5 Ladies

Adult 18 & Over League · 2.5 Women's

8 players · average NTRP 3.12 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-04-23vs Rally RebelsWon 21
W#1 DoublesNoemi Maldonado / Mirian Mendoza vs Kimberly Gil / Sara Salido4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDebbie Martinez vs Brenda Santos3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMonica Mendoza / Yvonne Casso vs Annabel Kent / Deyanira Cardenas5-7, 4-6
2026-04-23vs Rally RebelsLost 12
W#1 DoublesCC Cabello / Monica Mendoza vs Brenda Santos / Annabel Kent7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesNoemi Maldonado vs Josefa Urteaga0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCamila Nacher / Yvonne Casso vs Kimberly Gil / Sara Salido4-6, 3-6
2026-04-15vs Rally RebelsLost 12
W#1 DoublesDebbie Martinez / CC Cabello vs Kimberly Gil / Deyanira Cardenas6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMacArena Gonzalez vs Josefa Urteaga5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesYvonne Casso / Camila Nacher vs Roxanna Gonzalez Muzza / Brenda Santos3-6, 1-6
2026-04-10vs Rally RebelsLost 03
L#1 DoublesMirian Mendoza / Monica Mendoza vs Sara Salido / Roxanna Gonzalez Muzza2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMacArena Gonzalez vs Josefa Urteaga4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCC Cabello / Debbie Martinez vs Deyanira Cardenas / Annabel Kent4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women's have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Cledson Carvalho
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
2.76
Debbie Martinez
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.55
Camila Nacher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.34
MacArena Gonzalez
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.34
Noemi Maldonado
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.22
CC Cabello
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.11
Mirian Mendoza
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.11
Yvonne Casso
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

CC Cabello + Debbie Martinez4170% games+15.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cledson Carvalho
1W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.78
3
Debbie Martinez
5W–1L career · type D · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Camila Nacher
1W–2L career · type D · 2 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
2.55
MacArena Gonzalez
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.34
Noemi Maldonado
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.34
2.5
CC Cabello
5W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
Mirian Mendoza
3W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Yvonne Casso
2W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.