Teams

KTC-Stevens

2026 OH OV WINTER 18&O Mixed · Winter 18&O 7.0MXD

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2026-05-15vs QRRC-HaneyLost 02
L#2 DoublesLauren Moorman / William Stanforth vs Clayton Burkle / Gretchen Trubee6-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesErik Moro / Lauren Moro vs Veronica Smallwood / Michael Smallwood3-6, 4-6
2026-05-03vs QRRC-AndersonLost 01
L#3 DoublesAudrey Vanhoose / Philip Pierce vs Gary Gill / Kristi Warren6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-04-24vs KTC-ShivelyLost 02
L#2 DoublesKyle Nagel / Kathy Bleidorn vs Cory Natoli / Jenna Hagood0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPhilip Pierce / Sarah Pierce vs Jeremy Flora / Meryl Hattenbach6-7, 4-6
2026-04-19vs WPAFB-BrownLost 12
L#1 DoublesRoy Stevens / Sydney Corbean vs Joel Somerset / Katie Ruef3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLindsay Gustafson / Philip Pierce vs Josh Gross / Jacqueline Coffey6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesErik Moro / Lauren Moro vs Claudio Bellini / Skylla Frye2-6, 3-6
2026-04-12Lost 01
L#3 DoublesRoy Stevens / Audrey Vanhoose vs Rodolfo Aguilera / Katie Boeckman1-6, 1-6
2026-03-14Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJennifer Wu / Philip Pierce vs Tabatha Ashley / Andrew Garofoli3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-03-07vs QRRC-ElsassLost 12
W#1 DoublesPhilip Pierce / Lauren Moorman vs Casey Bagley / Rubinder Dab6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLauren Keeley / Kyle Nagel vs SONU Singh / Megan Popp2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesZina Williams / William Stanforth vs Jill Bramini / Mike Madoffori4-6, 5-7
2026-02-21vs QRRC-AndersonWon 10
W#1 DoublesKyle Nagel / Kelsey Cramer vs Conrad Klank / Kelsey Schuering6-3, 7-6
2026-02-07vs KTC-ShivelyLost 01
L#3 DoublesPhilip Pierce / Sarah Pierce vs Meryl Hattenbach / Jeremy Flora6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-02-06vs QRRC-GoelLost 12
L#1 DoublesRoy Stevens / Sydney Corbean vs Katrina Callahan / Rajeev Goel5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLauren Moorman / Philip Pierce vs John Daley / Karen Coffman6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLauren Keeley / William Stanforth vs Melonie Johnson / Eric Lowman1-6, 1-6
2026-01-31vs KTC-RotellaLost 12
L#1 DoublesZina Williams / Jeffrey Rodgers vs Frank BUDDY Pitts Jr / Maggie Leadman5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLindsay Gustafson / Roy Stevens vs Kelsey Rotella / Kevin Wimer3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLauren Keeley / William Stanforth vs Angelina Grosso / Dillon Frets6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2026-01-23vs SRTC-MillerLost 03
L#1 DoublesZina Williams / Jeffrey Rodgers vs Chris Schlater / Rebecca Cobb2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRoy Stevens / Sarah Pierce vs Todd Kissel / Tabatha Ashley4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLauren Moorman / Kyle Nagel vs Mary Miller / Chris Sayre4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Winter 18&O 7.0MXD
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1QRRC-Trubee802139160
2QRRC-Anderson1771736250
3KTC-Stevens1732142273

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Philip Pierce
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.59
Jeffrey Rodgers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Roy Stevens
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.31
Kyle Nagel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.14
Zina Williams
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Sydney Corbean
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Erik Moro
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
William Stanforth
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.93
Lauren Keeley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.90
Lauren Moro
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Lindsay Gustafson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Lauren Moorman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erik Moro + Lauren Moro91349% games+1.2% vs expected
Sydney Corbean + Roy Stevens3447% games−0.3% vs expected
Lindsay Gustafson + Roy Stevens1442% gamesnot enough data
Roy Stevens + Zina Williams0539% gamesnot enough data
Jeffrey Rodgers + Zina Williams033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Philip Pierce
62W–72L career · 7 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
3.66
Jeffrey Rodgers
50W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.59
Roy Stevens
79W–135L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
3.31
Kyle Nagel
69W–66L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
Zina Williams
101W–155L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
3.14
Sydney Corbean
77W–58L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.11
3.5
Erik Moro
24W–35L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.09
William Stanforth
21W–38L career · 4 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.94
Lauren Keeley
41W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
Lauren Moro
14W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
2.90
Lindsay Gustafson
100W–198L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.90
Lauren Moorman
75W–59L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.