Teams

Oates/Telford/Russellville/BP

2023 Tri-Level 18 & Over · 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.92 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-08-15vs TGarretson/NLR/BPLost 01
L#1 DoublesCendey Roberts / Rebecca Kinworthy vs Jacquelyn Harrison / Andrea Sellew2-6, 3-6
2023-08-09vs Rumbach/Youngdahl/NLR/LRRCWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristy Bray / Rebecca Kinworthy vs Colleen Youngdahl / Molly Sanders6-1, 6-2
2023-08-02vs Sullivan/CCLRWon 10
W#1 DoublesRebecca Kinworthy / Amie Denton vs Ashley Knickrehm / Cornelia Lea6-4, 6-0
2023-07-31vs Raines/LR/PVCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmie Denton / Rebecca Kinworthy vs Laura Titus / Janna Jennings6-2, 6-4
2023-07-27Won 10
W#1 DoublesRebecca Kinworthy / Christy Bray vs Amanda Crowley / Lori Smith6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Courtney Newell
published 4
3.89
Jennifer Quilao
published
3.84
Cendey Roberts
published 4
3.82
Christy Bray
published 4
3.79
Amie Denton
published 4
3.70
Tiffani Jedlicka
published
3.69
Rebecca Kinworthy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Jennifer Fielding
published
3.29
Susanna Lukas
published
3.27
Molly Telford
published
3.26
Christine Althoff
published 3.5
3.24
Emily Andrews-Clark
published
3.23
Melissa Oates
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cendey Roberts + Christy Bray4357% games+4.3% vs expected
Courtney Newell + Tiffani Jedlicka3447% games−4.0% vs expected
Jennifer Quilao + Tiffani Jedlicka303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Courtney Newell
24W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.90
Jennifer Quilao
35W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%21%
3.89
4
Cendey Roberts
31W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Christy Bray
16W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Amie Denton
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.79
Tiffani Jedlicka
54W–27L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Rebecca Kinworthy
146W–99L career · 5 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.69
Jennifer Fielding
19W–13L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.67
Susanna Lukas
16W–8L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
Molly Telford
23W–24L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Christine Althoff
23W–19L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
Emily Andrews-Clark
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
97%3%<1%
3.24
Melissa Oates
26W–31L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.