Teams

GEPTA-3.5-Adult/W(Cardenas)(CCC#2)

SouthernNewMexico · 2023 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

17 players · average NTRP 3.17 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2023 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Adriana Zaragoza
published 3.5
Christina Ybanez
published 3.5
3.04
Cynthia Canales
published 3.5
2.89
Carla Canales
published 3
2.82
Celia Al-Tahan
published 3
Allison Marquez
published 3
2.72
Sonia Natividad
published
2.66
Anita Boss
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.41
Carmen Cardenas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jennifer Bush
published
Lorena Sosa
published
Lourdes Olivas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Shannon Rhoads
published
Valerie Edmunds
published
Yzahiti Angulo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sonia Natividad + Lorena Sosa11454% games+9.2% vs expected
Jennifer Bush + Celia Al-Tahan3347% games+5.7% vs expected
Lourdes Olivas + Celia Al-Tahan273547% games+5.4% vs expected
Lourdes Olivas + Anita Boss121248% games+2.8% vs expected
Carmen Cardenas + Celia Al-Tahan21737% games+0.2% vs expected
Jennifer Bush + Anita Boss3844% games−2.1% vs expected
Celia Al-Tahan + Anita Boss252249% games−2.8% vs expected
Valerie Edmunds + Allison Marquez7651% games−2.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Adriana Zaragoza
44W–47L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Christina Ybanez
22W–16L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Cynthia Canales
24W–37L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.04
3
Carla Canales
49W–55L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Celia Al-Tahan
119W–164L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Allison Marquez
12W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Elizabeth Edmunds
1W–22L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sonia Natividad
39W–37L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Anita Boss
85W–102L career · 2 lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
2.66
3
Carmen Cardenas
31W–115L career · type A · 1 line in 2023
77%23%<1%
2.41
Jennifer Bush
67W–81L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lorena Sosa
64W–114L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lourdes Olivas
98W–118L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Patricia Contreras-Enloe
4W–23L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Shannon Rhoads
37W–91L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Valerie Edmunds
9W–29L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Yzahiti Angulo
56W–68L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.