Teams

Sharma - Ace Ace Baby (singles 3.0)

2026 Montgomery Singles · Montgomery Singles 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.88 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 5 played
Sep 16 9:00 PM
Norbeck Country Club
Sep 27 4:00 PM
Wheaton Indoor Tennis Center
2026-09-01vs Aizpuru - On Thin AizWon 30
W#1 SinglesKrissie Zenkewicz vs Jennifer Whitney6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesAngela Sharma vs Dana Willard6-2, 6-0
W#3 SinglesAlina Sharafutdinova vs Melissa Walker6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesElizabeth McLeod vs Vivian Garcia-Tunon2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJocelyn McDaniel vs Robin Rudowitz2-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesGrace Gan vs Louise Smith7-6, 6-1
2026-08-12vs Aizpuru - On Thin AizWon 30
W#1 SinglesKrissie Zenkewicz vs Jennifer Whitney2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMegan Rappolt vs Lindsey Trickett5-1
W#3 SinglesAlina Sharafutdinova vs Gretchen Stoll6-1, 6-1
2026-08-02vs Tennis Darlings - DullabhLost 02
L#1 SinglesEmily Rodriguez vs Hrachuhi Babayan6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesGrace Gan vs Jennifer Donaghue5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJocelyn McDaniel vs Vivian Garcia-Tunon0-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesKarina Perez vs Louise Smith6-4, 6-3
W#3 SinglesIrina Tsybina vs Johanne Maher6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Montgomery Singles 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Tennis Darlings - Dullabh3193776
2Sharma - Ace Ace Baby (singles 3.0)22751190
3Storer - Not Racket Science: Smash Force Edition225714108
4Aizpuru - On Thin Aiz133919128

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Emily Rodriguez
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
3.00
Megan Rappolt
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.00
Irina Tsybina
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.91
Angela Sharma
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.87
Alina Sharafutdinova
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.85
Karina Perez
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.81
Krissie Zenkewicz
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.79
Elizabeth McLeod
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.61
Jocelyn McDaniel
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.26
Antigone Potamianos
published 2.5
2.25
Grace Gan
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Emily Rodriguez
7W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.04
Megan Rappolt
10W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Irina Tsybina
36W–18L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.00
3
Angela Sharma
57W–78L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Alina Sharafutdinova
17W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.87
Karina Perez
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Krissie Zenkewicz
67W–94L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Elizabeth McLeod
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
1%93%6%
2.79
Jocelyn McDaniel
49W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.61
2.5
Antigone Potamianos
4W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.26
2.5
Grace Gan
10W–12L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.