Teams

RCCB - Vickers

2026 Brevard Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-17vs RCCB - RosenquistLost 01
L#2 DoublesMegan Holthaus / Joanna Garcia vs Julie Cole / Lee Harrington0-6, 5-7
2026-08-10vs EFSC - SimmonsLost 02
L#1 DoublesIvy Evatt / Sue Lutter vs Jessica Vega Coots / Gaylyn Woodruff3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMegan Holthaus / Terra Hovan vs Christina Kopp / Gena Wools4-6, 3-6
2026-08-03vs EFSC - Kiss My AceLost 01
L#2 DoublesCatherine Grainger / Megan Holthaus vs Liz Donnelly / Emily Dwyer1-6, 1-6
2026-07-27vs Suntree - PassmoreLost 01
L#1 DoublesHeather Crane / Joanna Garcia vs SARA BRESETTE / Amira Tolles1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Ivy Evatt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Tracy Jacobus
published
3.47
Angela Duckworth
published 3.5
3.41
Michele Heyn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Terra Hovan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Joanna Garcia
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.28
Leslie Love
published
3.25
Heather Crane
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Samantha Martin
published
3.23
Catherine Grainger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Sue Lutter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Melissa Vickers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Megan Holthaus
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michele Heyn + Terra Hovan2441% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ivy Evatt
12W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
Tracy Jacobus
6W–2L career · no lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Angela Duckworth
8W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Michele Heyn
109W–104L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.41
3.5
Terra Hovan
108W–70L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
Joanna Garcia
24W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Leslie Love
17W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.28
3.5
Heather Crane
96W–76L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Samantha Martin
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
3.24
3.5
Catherine Grainger
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Sue Lutter
20W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.20
Melissa Vickers
20W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.94
Megan Holthaus
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.