Teams

GEPTA/18&over/3.5M/Jones/EPTC#5

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
David Milne
usually #1 Doubles 48%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published 3.5
3.45
Cristian Trejo
usually #1 Doubles 31%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published 3.5
3.36
Darren James
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 39% · published 3.5
Dmitry Vishnevetsky
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Enrique Mata
usually #2 Doubles 31%, also #3 Doubles 28% · published
FRANCISCO JAVIER IGLESIAS LOPEZ
usually #2 Singles 63%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published
Jaime Rojas Sandoval
usually #1 Singles 69%, also #1 Doubles 15% · published
Javier MacIas
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Jose Gabilondo
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Juan Castaneda
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Pedro Ibarra
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Ray Bonds
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Ricardo Gustavo Tuda Vargas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Royval Sosa
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Zaphnath Jaramillo
usually #1 Singles 42%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ray Bonds + David Milne15161% gamesnot enough data
Javier MacIas + Cristian Trejo404 matchesnot enough data
Jose Gabilondo + FRANCISCO JAVIER IGLESIAS LOPEZ224 matchesnot enough data
Ray Bonds + Dmitry Vishnevetsky303 matchesnot enough data
Darren James + Dmitry Vishnevetsky303 matchesnot enough data
Enrique Mata + Dmitry Vishnevetsky303 matchesnot enough data
Jose Gabilondo + Juan Castaneda123 matchesnot enough data
Juan Castaneda + Royval Sosa123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Milne
26W–3L career · 27 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Cristian Trejo
22W–12L career · 27 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.45
3.5
Darren James
56W–48L career · 23 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.36
Dmitry Vishnevetsky
40W–17L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Enrique Mata
56W–103L career · 27 lines in 2026
not enough data
FRANCISCO JAVIER IGLESIAS LOPEZ
21W–15L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jaime Rojas Sandoval
12W–1L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data
Javier MacIas
31W–19L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jose Gabilondo
11W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Juan Castaneda
9W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Pedro Ibarra
20W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ray Bonds
64W–54L career · 31 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ricardo Gustavo Tuda Vargas
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Royval Sosa
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Zaphnath Jaramillo
24W–41L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.