Teams

Thongphok 3.0-4.0 Tri

2023 Frederick Tri-Level 18 & Over · Tri-Level Women 4.0, 3.5, 3.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.44 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-11-28Won 10
W#3 DoublesSandy Thongphok / Karen Coyne vs Shannon Vetter / Kristy Sullivan6-0, 6-1
2023-10-31vs Alban - Volley for SallyWon 10
W#3 DoublesKaren Coyne / Katherine Dodson vs Kim Meissner / Shelley Swaim6-2, 6-3
2023-10-09vs Alban - Volley for SallyWon 10
W#3 DoublesShelby Price / Karen Coyne vs Kim Meissner / Kara Jones6-4, 6-3
2023-10-06Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Coyne / Eliza Green vs Amy LaMoure / Kristin Ostlie3-6, 2-6
2023-10-03Won 10
W#2 DoublesKaren Coyne / Eliza Green vs Teresa Reefe / Deborah Dettmer6-4, 4-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level Women 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Laura Henmueller
published 4
3.56
Sandy Thongphok
published 3.5
3.28
Cora Ho
published 3.5
Eliza Green
published 3.5
3.17
Nikki Eyman
usually #3 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Laura McNay
published
3.15
Katherine Dodson
published
3.11
Brenda Crowe
published 3.5
3.08
Karen Coyne
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.03
Carol Darling
published 3
2.88
Carrie Derse
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Henmueller + Cora Ho41241% gamesnot enough data
Karen Coyne + Cora Ho213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Laura Henmueller
121W–170L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Sandy Thongphok
277W–124L career · no lines in 2023
<1%33%67%
3.56
3.5
Cora Ho
120W–87L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Eliza Green
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Nikki Eyman
233W–188L career · 12 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.17
Laura McNay
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.16
Katherine Dodson
44W–68L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Brenda Crowe
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.11
3.5
Karen Coyne
62W–89L career · 5 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Carol Darling
45W–29L career · no lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Carrie Derse
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
2.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.