Teams

OC LNRC - Avi - Sat1030

2024 Orange County Holiday Mixed Doubles · OC Holiday MXD 8.5

16 players · average NTRP 4.32 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#3 Mixed DoublesFrank Gagnon / Danielle D'Amico vs Dion Trieb / Nancy Chan6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-12-28vs OC Los Cab - Nicole - Sun3Won 10
W#1 Mixed DoublesFrank Gagnon / Danielle D'Amico vs Nicole Doan / Andrew Hedges7-6, 6-3
2024-12-22vs OC Mesa Verde CC - Jenna - Sun130Won 10
W#2 Mixed DoublesFrank Gagnon / Danielle D'Amico vs Robert Rourke / Teresa Chow5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 Mixed DoublesAyako Hasegawa / Brian Richardson vs Jesse Bolling / Nina Berry7-5, 5-5
2024-11-17vs OC NBTC - FrancisWon 10
W#2 Mixed DoublesAyako Hasegawa / BaoAnh Nguyen vs Daniel Tat / Rachel Tran6-4, 6-3
W#3 Mixed DoublesJulian Jaramillo / Ayako Hasegawa vs Christopher Nero / Liz Kirksey6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Holiday MXD 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.05 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.47
Matt Szen
published 4.5
4.46
Danielle D'Amico
usually #2 Mixed Doubles 33%, also #1 Mixed Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.36
Alissa Ahlman
published 4.5
BaoAnh Nguyen
published 4.5
4.07
Miwa Ishisaka
published
4.06
Avinash Mehta
published 4
4.01
Julian Jaramillo
published
3.99
Morgan Nusz
published
3.95
Brian Richardson
published 4.5
3.95
Geoffrey Bishop
published 4
3.91
Megan Osborn
published
3.87
Ayako Hasegawa
usually #2 Mixed Doubles 67%, also #3 Mixed Doubles 33% · published 4
3.86
Sung Eun Kim
published
3.86
Jaala Zabrocki
published 4
3.84
Eric Liu
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julian Jaramillo + Sung Eun Kim303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Elizaveta Buckbee
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Matt Szen
85W–24L career · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
4.47
4.5
Danielle D'Amico
91W–45L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
4.46
4.5
Alissa Ahlman
28W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
4.36
4.5
BaoAnh Nguyen
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Miwa Ishisaka
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
4.07
4
Avinash Mehta
19W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%32%68%
4.06
Julian Jaramillo
23W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
4.01
Morgan Nusz
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
3.99
4.5
Brian Richardson
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
3.95
4
Geoffrey Bishop
29W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.95
Megan Osborn
8W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Ayako Hasegawa
64W–28L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.87
Sung Eun Kim
12W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%85%14%
3.86
4
Jaala Zabrocki
12W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Eric Liu
23W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%89%10%
3.84

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.