Teams

Hills/Huntington/65&Over6.0W

2025 Hillsborough Adult 65 & Over · 6.0 Adult 65 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-07vs Super Sassy Sixties - E. VickersWon 10
W#2 DoublesDebra Lowe / Lynn Malarz vs Anne Stafford / Carmen Heggen7-5, 6-4
2025-02-28vs Plant City 65+ Dames - P. SmithWon 10
W#3 DoublesKathleen Gafarian / Sharon Lucas vs Julianna Holbrook / Susan Rind6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2025-02-14vs Super Sassy Sixties - E. VickersWon 10
W#1 DoublesDebra Lowe / Sharon Woodruff vs Amy Rairigh / Pamela Gonzalez6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2025-02-08vs Super Sassy Sixties - E. VickersWon 10
W#1 DoublesDebra Lowe / Barbara Dolan vs Katherine Grichnik / Anne McKenna6-2, 6-2
2025-02-07vs Plant City 65+ Dames - P. SmithLost 01
L#1 DoublesSharon Lucas / Lynn Malarz vs Catherine Mueller / Susan Sommerfield6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Adult 65 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Debra Lowe
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
Kathleen Gafarian
published
2.33
Barbara Dolan
published 3
Kathleen Norton
published
Lynn Malarz
published
Mary Huntington
published
Nancy Matuszak
published
Renee Hovden
published
Sharon Lucas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Sharon Woodruff
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margaret McGillivray + Kathleen Gafarian6063% gamesnot enough data
Debra Lowe + Kathleen Norton404 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Matuszak + Lynn Malarz213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Debra Lowe
57W–46L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.89
Kathleen Gafarian
12W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Barbara Dolan
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
2.33
Kathleen Norton
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lynn Malarz
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Margaret McGillivray
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Huntington
6W–16L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Matuszak
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Renee Hovden
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sharon Lucas
39W–70L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sharon Woodruff
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.