Teams

SD 3.5 LLW Mtn View Ace Breakers- Louis

2021 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD · SD - Women - 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.70 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-05-18vs SD 3.5 Coronado TC 9AM/ SchmiedWon 10
W#2 DoublesVeronica Ruffo / Celia Hernandez vs Joan Fahrenthold / Veronica Marti7-5, 7-6
2021-04-27Won 10
W#1 DoublesVeronica Ruffo / Lilyan Ruiz vs JIMENA CUEVAS / Kathy Nichols6-4, 6-2
2021-04-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesVeronica Ruffo / Lilyan Ruiz vs Yaz Gomez / Maria Aiza6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Brandy Baray
published 4
3.75
Guadalupe Garcia
published 4
3.58
Veronica Ruffo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.54
Paola Romo
published
3.48
Lilyan Ruiz
published 3.5
3.42
Susie Alvarez
published 4
3.39
Viviana Rozo
published 3.5
3.27
Celia Hernandez
published 3.5
3.23
JACQUELINE SAENZ
published 3.5
3.20
3.09
Elizabeth Ponce
published 3.5
3.01
Maria Corbitt
published 3.5
Roxana Balboa
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Veronica Ruffo + Brandy Baray6846% gamesnot enough data
JACQUELINE SAENZ + Lilyan Ruiz7552% gamesnot enough data
Susie Alvarez + Brandy Baray6455% gamesnot enough data
Maria Corbitt + Viviana Rozo4449% gamesnot enough data
JACQUELINE SAENZ + Brandy Baray3353% gamesnot enough data
Veronica Ruffo + Lilyan Ruiz2348% gamesnot enough data
Maria Corbitt + JACQUELINE SAENZ044 matchesnot enough data
Brandy Baray + Guadalupe Garcia404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brandy Baray
113W–102L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Guadalupe Garcia
19W–17L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Veronica Ruffo
135W–157L career · 3 lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
3.58
Paola Romo
12W–14L career · no lines in 2021
37%63%<1%
3.54
3.5
Lilyan Ruiz
105W–70L career · no lines in 2021
<1%55%44%
3.48
4
Susie Alvarez
84W–81L career · no lines in 2021
73%27%<1%
3.42
3.5
Viviana Rozo
68W–80L career · no lines in 2021
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Celia Hernandez
11W–3L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
JACQUELINE SAENZ
90W–85L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
Luisa Garcia de la Cabada
0W–10L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Elizabeth Ponce
7W–11L career · no lines in 2021
23%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Maria Corbitt
54W–51L career · no lines in 2021
46%54%<1%
3.01
Roxana Balboa
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.