Teams

KH:Serves You Right: Meyer/Woodruff

2025 SCT Adult 18 & Over Women Summer · 4.0 Women

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-16vs KH:New Ads 18+:GaillardWon 10
W#1 DoublesRachel Gigliotti / Cornelia Toothaker vs Marianne Kaplan / Oona Robinson6-4, 6-2
L#1 DoublesChristine Barkley / Sarah Konecke vs Sylvie Roisin / Ariadna Parlaghy4-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJori Meyer vs Amy Kaufman0-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEmelyn Northway / Cornelia Toothaker vs Elizabeth Wells / Lourdes Marti6-3, 5-7
W#3 DoublesStefanie Vitti / Casey McBride vs Maria Ayala / Sharon Casey7-6, 5-4
L#1 DoublesRachel Gigliotti / Marisa Ehrlich-Siegel vs Heather Thompson / Lauren Lazar5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesEmelyn Northway vs Debbie Cannavino4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTory Woodruff / Elena Phillips vs Ali Campbell / Leah Butler2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKori Rentz / Maren Nelson vs Christina Bischoff / Lori Abrams0-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesRachel Gigliotti / Cornelia Toothaker vs Alexis Sweet / Deborah Jaroch1-6, 6-7
L#1 DoublesJori Meyer / Emelyn Northway vs Heather Thompson / Lauren Lazar2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesCourtney McKinney vs Katy Gonnelli3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMarisa Ehrlich-Siegel / Cornelia Toothaker vs Debbie Cannavino / Kelly Ryan-Gartrell5-7, 4-5
L#3 DoublesStefanie Vitti / Tory Woodruff vs Andrea Hjelte / Miran Robarts6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesEmelyn Northway / Rachel Gigliotti vs Ann Zaminski / Abby Meiselman7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJori Meyer / Cornelia Toothaker vs Elizabeth Wells / Jane Hentemann6-3, 6-5
L#3 DoublesTory Woodruff / Elena Phillips vs Natasha Kloster / Maria Ayala6-0, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Courtney McKinney
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.81
Rachel Gigliotti
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Emelyn Northway
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.70
Jori Meyer
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.66
Sarah Konecke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Millyn Gaaserud
published
3.62
Christine Barkley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Kori Rentz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Marisa Ehrlich-Siegel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.59
Maren Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Cornelia Toothaker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Jennifer Forlizzi
published
3.47
Elena Phillips
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.47
Agnes Temerowski
published 4
3.46
Anne Sharpe
published 4
3.45
Tory Woodruff
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Stefanie Vitti
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stefanie Vitti + Courtney McKinney5162% games+12.7% vs expected
Cornelia Toothaker + Marisa Ehrlich-Siegel3259% games+11.0% vs expected
Rachel Gigliotti + Courtney McKinney161059% games+10.1% vs expected
Rachel Gigliotti + Emelyn Northway11457% games+9.7% vs expected
Christine Barkley + Jori Meyer5259% games+8.9% vs expected
Christine Barkley + Elena Phillips9455% games+8.0% vs expected
Christine Barkley + Tory Woodruff8457% games+6.6% vs expected
Jennifer Forlizzi + Millyn Gaaserud5454% games+4.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Courtney McKinney
98W–54L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.88
Rachel Gigliotti
94W–58L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Emelyn Northway
44W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
Jori Meyer
79W–73L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
Sarah Konecke
81W–45L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.66
Millyn Gaaserud
74W–42L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Christine Barkley
49W–51L career · 1 line in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.62
Kori Rentz
12W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.61
Marisa Ehrlich-Siegel
55W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.61
Maren Nelson
33W–40L career · 1 line in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Cornelia Toothaker
38W–33L career · 3 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
Jennifer Forlizzi
46W–20L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.52
4
Elena Phillips
54W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
3.47
4
Agnes Temerowski
77W–48L career · no lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.47
4
Anne Sharpe
11W–10L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.46
Tory Woodruff
143W–102L career · 3 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.45
Stefanie Vitti
125W–96L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.