Teams

Malone & Pennington

2026 South East Tennis Singles 18 & Over League · 3.0 Men 18 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-02-25vs Moore 18+ SinglesLost 03
L#1 SinglesGreg Malone vs Valtteri Halonen4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAta Suanda vs Ramon Aristy3-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesChris Datesman vs Scott Serkin6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2026-02-18vs Moore 18+ SinglesLost 12
W#1 SinglesDoug Vogt vs Scott Serkin6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesGregory Loehr vs Valtteri Halonen3-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesHunter Carpenter vs Ramon Aristy7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2026-02-16vs Moore 18+ SinglesLost 12
W#1 SinglesDoug Vogt vs Todd Doroski6-3, 7-5
L#2 SinglesGregory Loehr vs Matthew Messier2-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesChris Datesman vs Stuart Moore3-6, 1-6
2026-01-26vs Moore 18+ SinglesLost 03
L#1 SinglesMatthew Ramirez vs Scott Serkin4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesRand Pennington vs Ramon Aristy1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesAta Suanda vs Valtteri Halonen3-6, 3-6
2026-01-17vs Moore 18+ SinglesLost 12
L#1 SinglesMatthew Ramirez vs Stuart Moore3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesGreg Malone vs Matthew Messier2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 SinglesChris Datesman vs Ramon Aristy2-6, 0-6
2026-01-14vs Moore 18+ SinglesLost 12
L#1 SinglesMatthew Ramirez vs Todd Doroski2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesHunter Carpenter vs Valtteri Halonen2-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesDoug Vogt vs Matthew Messier6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Men 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Moore 18+ Singles7017411125
2Malone & Pennington0741735229

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Doug Vogt
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
3.06
Greg Malone
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.87
Hunter Carpenter
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.76
Gregory Loehr
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.75
Ata Suanda
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.62
Matthew Ramirez
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.59
Chris Datesman
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.33
Rand Pennington
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rand Pennington + Ata Suanda0733% games−6.5% vs expected
Ata Suanda + Matthew Ramirez044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Doug Vogt
41W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%15%85%
3.13
3
Greg Malone
45W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.06
3
Hunter Carpenter
24W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Gregory Loehr
20W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Ata Suanda
30W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
Matthew Ramirez
7W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.62
3
Chris Datesman
13W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.59
Rand Pennington
21W–52L career · 1 line in 2026
90%10%<1%
2.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.