Teams

EW-WRAC-Noyd

2023 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-07-08vs CBRC-MehlenbacherWon 21
W#1 DoublesKIMBERLY HABICH / Mark Taylor vs Todd Samuel / Huijuan Zhang3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDonna Parsons / Michael Bendtsen vs Bryan Coles / Paula Davis-Vedder6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesANNA MILNER / Bryan Noyd vs Evan Mehlenbacher / Kathy Mehlenbacher1-3
2023-07-07vs CBRC-MehlenbacherWon 21
L#1 DoublesANNA MILNER / Richard Lester vs Kent Ozkardesh / Victoria Smoot2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDonna Parsons / Brad Bartol vs Bryan Coles / Kathy Mehlenbacher6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesEllen Lester / Michael Bendtsen vs Todd Samuel / Huijuan Zhang6-4, 7-5
2023-07-07vs CBRC-MehlenbacherWon 21
W#1 DoublesEllen Lester / Michael Bendtsen vs Bryan Coles / Kathy Mehlenbacher7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKIMBERLY HABICH / Brad Bartol vs Victoria Smoot / Kent Ozkardesh7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesANNA MILNER / Richard Lester vs Evan Mehlenbacher / Paula Davis-Vedder2-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EW-WRAC-Noyd3063879
2CBRC-Mehlenbacher03361388

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brad Bartol
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.43
Donna Parsons
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Bryan Noyd
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Ellen Lester
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
KIMBERLY HABICH
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Mark Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Bendtsen
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Richard Lester
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ellen Lester + Richard Lester31046% gamesnot enough data
KIMBERLY HABICH + Brad Bartol7074% gamesnot enough data
Ellen Lester + Michael Bendtsen4157% gamesnot enough data
Richard Lester + KIMBERLY HABICH303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brad Bartol
39W–10L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Donna Parsons
55W–18L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Bryan Noyd
23W–13L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Ellen Lester
22W–24L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
KIMBERLY HABICH
63W–19L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mark Taylor
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Michael Bendtsen
67W–43L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Richard Lester
38W–29L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.