Teams

Maggin

2023 Montgomery Adult Other Fall Weekday Women · Montgomery Adult Other 4.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.86 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-12-05vs WesleyWon 10
W#2 DoublesKeelin Gallagher / Catherine Zimmermann vs Margaret Brown / Teri Fahlgren6-4, 6-2
2023-12-01vs Point BreakersWon 10
W#2 DoublesJill Casasola / Keelin Gallagher vs Regina Farrington / Mary Barton-Dock6-0, 6-3
2023-11-27vs Moco Match MakersWon 10
W#2 DoublesKim Purring / Catherine Zimmermann vs Pamela Hjelle / Nancy Hull6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-11-02vs Manor 4.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesKeelin Gallagher / Catherine Zimmermann vs Kelley Donellan / Cathy Ventrell-Monsees7-5, 5-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult Other 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Dawn Yules
published 4
3.87
Cheryl Hays
published 4
Anna Maggin
published 4
3.74
Ann Kopsidas
published 4
3.73
Meredith Berlin
published
3.73
Keelin Gallagher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Laurie Stien
published
3.64
Jill Casasola
published
3.60
Kim Purring
published
3.38
Catherine Zimmermann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Cameron Caskin
published 3.5
Nancy Eisner
published
Rebecca Sirody
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Keelin Gallagher + Catherine Zimmermann6355% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dawn Yules
12W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Cheryl Hays
6W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.87
4
Anna Maggin
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Ann Kopsidas
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.74
Meredith Berlin
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Keelin Gallagher
77W–25L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Laurie Stien
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
Jill Casasola
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.64
Kim Purring
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.60
3.5
Catherine Zimmermann
17W–20L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.38
3.5
Cameron Caskin
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Eisner
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rebecca Sirody
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.