Teams

Courtsiders

2024 55&Over Women · 7.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-13vs Match WiseLost 03
L#1 DoublesJanet Ronan / Nancy Wilbert vs Kathleen Francioso / Maribel Unanue4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJan Skeuse / Grace Davitt vs Suzanne Crosby / Michele Gioia2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Peters / Donna Krupinski vs Linda Fiumefreddo / Donghui Zhang6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2024-08-07vs Racquet Strings AttachedWon 30
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Ballantine / Grace Davitt vs Cathleen Lopez / Patricia Vaughan6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesShelley Berger / Meredith Bzdak vs Alice Chao / Earnecia Hasben-Powers6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDonna Krupinski / Linda Peters vs Jacqueline Cyran / Sharon Muenster6-2, 6-3
2024-07-30vs Serve-ivorsSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJudy Slusar / Sara Mitchell vs Marta Kuttner / Jill Retik6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCathleen Ferns / Grace Davitt vs Ellen Gilio / Louise Arkel6-3, 6-0
2024-07-23vs Eastern/Van Mol/55&Over7.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Ballantine / Nancy Wilbert vs Janet Bellaran / Mina Castillo3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Boyle / Janet Ronan vs Cheryl-Anne Bliss / Jan Hoth5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesShelley Berger / Donna Krupinski vs Karen James / Barbara Jacobus3-6, 3-6
2024-07-16vs Match WiseLost 03
L#1 DoublesMeredith Bzdak / Shelley Berger vs Kimberly Ajavananda / Maria Levine4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Brasher / Constance Hindle vs Hazel-Ann Rodney / Jean Zhang2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJan Skeuse / Judy Slusar vs Sarah MacKay / Jill Markovits0-6, 0-6
2024-07-09vs GK Honey DeucesWon 30
W#1 DoublesJodi Little / Nancy Wilbert vs Mary Pezzella / Maura Murray6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSara Mitchell / Karen Boyle vs Susan Roos / Deborah Fafian6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCathleen Ferns / Laura Brasher vs Rana Bernhard / Joanne Wroblewski6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Eastern/Van Mol/55&Over7.0W6016210127
2Match Wise4214412121
3Courtsiders2471122155
4Racquet Strings Attached2481023171
5GK Honey Deuces0601836216

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Linda Peters
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Shelley Berger
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.39
Elizabeth Ballantine
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.34
Nancy Wilbert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Constance Hindle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Donna Krupinski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Judy Slusar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.16
Laura Brasher
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Karen Boyle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Grace Davitt
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Janet Ronan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.04
Cathleen Ferns
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.92
Jan Skeuse
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jodi Little
published
Meredith Bzdak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Sara Mitchell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Peters + Laura Brasher23464% games+9.3% vs expected
Cathleen Ferns + Grace Davitt5164% games+8.1% vs expected
Constance Hindle + Nancy Wilbert9160% games+8.0% vs expected
Linda Peters + Nancy Wilbert7264% games+7.3% vs expected
Elizabeth Ballantine + Karen Boyle8361% games+6.4% vs expected
Janet Ronan + Constance Hindle2351% games+3.8% vs expected
Linda Peters + Donna Krupinski171955% games+2.3% vs expected
Laura Brasher + Grace Davitt11555% games+2.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linda Peters
153W–110L career · 2 lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.51
Shelley Berger
152W–152L career · 3 lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
Elizabeth Ballantine
70W–42L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.39
Nancy Wilbert
81W–43L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Constance Hindle
44W–36L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Donna Krupinski
29W–29L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Judy Slusar
20W–23L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
Laura Brasher
117W–104L career · 2 lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.16
Karen Boyle
33W–22L career · 2 lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Grace Davitt
51W–49L career · 3 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Janet Ronan
62W–64L career · 2 lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.08
3.5
Cathleen Ferns
75W–101L career · 2 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.04
Jan Skeuse
23W–25L career · 2 lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
2.92
Jodi Little
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Meredith Bzdak
19W–51L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sara Mitchell
7W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.