Teams

SFV LLW - Northridge Quakes - Alan Esguerra

2023 Adult 40+ SFV Winter · SFV 40 & Over - Men 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-04-02vs SFV Paseo UnitedLost 01
L#1 SinglesStephen Nettelhorst vs Harris Hall5-7, 1-6
2023-03-19vs SFV No SurrenderWon 20
W#1 SinglesJose Guerrero vs Roman Pyrzynski6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSteve Oetomo / Stephen Nettelhorst vs Robert Fox / Simon Khilkevich6-2, 6-2
2023-03-18vs SFV DominatorsWon 20
W#1 SinglesStephen Nettelhorst vs Burke Franklin6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBrian Chen / Jose Guerrero vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-03-12vs SFV The 300'sWon 10
W#1 SinglesStephen Nettelhorst vs Gregg Gossett6-2, 6-1
2023-01-22vs SFV Rooftop BallersWon 10
W#2 DoublesJose Mendoza / Stephen Nettelhorst vs Larry Lawrence / Chris Alexander6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 40 & Over - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alan Esguerra
published 4.5
4.23
Joe Chan
published
4.03
Stephen Nettelhorst
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.91
Scott Conroy
published
3.89
Jose Guerrero
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.87
Daniel Kanemoto
published 4
3.87
Kangsung Yip
published 4
3.85
Edward Rozman
published 4
3.80
William Ko
published
3.68
Steve Oetomo
published
3.39
Daniel Iwata
published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alan Esguerra
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Joe Chan
13W–7L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
4.23
4
Stephen Nettelhorst
157W–52L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
4.03
Scott Conroy
8W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%23%
3.91
Jose Guerrero
106W–47L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Daniel Kanemoto
23W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Kangsung Yip
132W–66L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Edward Rozman
3W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.85
William Ko
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.80
Steve Oetomo
9W–3L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Daniel Iwata
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.