Teams

LVSA-Sampoornam/NMP

2025 Lake Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 8.5 Men Wed PM 18s

10 players · average NTRP 4.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-15vs LKHA-Haynes/CSD-WP 18s 8.5 Wed pmLost 01
L#3 DoublesJordan Paterra / Aleksandr Lvovich vs Benjamin Keeney / Austin Miller3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-10-01vs LJBA-Banner/CSD 18+Combo8.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesAleksandr Lvovich / Jordan Paterra vs LUIS AYALA / Anhtuan Nguyen7-5, 6-4
2025-09-24vs LKHA-Haynes/CSD-WP 18s 8.5 Wed pmLost 01
L#2 DoublesAdam Colborne / Jon Schrand vs Benjamin Keeney / Austin Miller6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-10vs LJBA-Banner/CSD 18+Combo8.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesAdam Colborne / Jon Schrand vs Matthew Borcich / Josh Goldblatt6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHayden Tuttle / Jordan Paterra vs Alfu Miah / James Banner6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-09-03vs LKHA-Haynes/CSD-WP 18s 8.5 Wed pmWon 10
W#2 DoublesAdam Colborne / Jon Schrand vs Jason Woodsby / Alex Carver6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men Wed PM 18s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Adam Colborne
published 4.5
4.19
Vaughn Schmutz
published
4.10
Jordan Paterra
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.00
Jon Schrand
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.93
Hayden Tuttle
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.90
3.79
Aleksandr Lvovich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Steven Porter
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
Joe Wolff
published
Mitchell Hering
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Venkatesh Sampoornam + Hayden Tuttle5067% games+10.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Adam Colborne
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
4.20
Vaughn Schmutz
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Jordan Paterra
64W–57L career · 3 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
4.10
4
Jon Schrand
115W–73L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
4.00
4
Hayden Tuttle
136W–53L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.93
Venkatesh Sampoornam
20W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.90
4
Aleksandr Lvovich
146W–85L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Steven Porter
150W–89L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Joe Wolff
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mitchell Hering
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.