Teams

Van Schenck/Garfield/KTC

2025 Combo 40 & Over 5.5, 7.5 · 7.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-19vs Schaller-Overton/Rogers/PCCLost 12
W#1 DoublesStephanie Johnson / Anne Hurley vs Andrea Boyle / Colleen Daniels2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Casey / Crailin Hardy Best vs Libby Schaller / Carrie Overton3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMeera Narayan / Michelle Gilbert vs Amy Elliott / Paige Ferguson2-6, 1-6
2025-09-16vs Rickard-Wilson/Centerton/KTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesStephanie Johnson / Jeanie Shade vs Shannon Allen / Jill Whatley6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Coppick / Catherine Young vs Heather Wewers / Kimberly Rickard2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAnne Hurley / Sandy Kinsey vs Kathleen Wilson / Rebecca Cantey1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Karen Coppick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Jeanie Shade
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Jodee Gore-Miller
published
3.34
Sandy Kinsey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Catherine Young
published 3.5
3.21
3.18
Crailin Hardy Best
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Meera Narayan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Anne Hurley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
MALLORY LOWE
published
Michelle Gilbert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Regan Moore
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle van Schenck + Crailin Hardy Best224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Coppick
11W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Jeanie Shade
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.51
Jodee Gore-Miller
16W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Sandy Kinsey
14W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Catherine Young
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle van Schenck
22W–30L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Crailin Hardy Best
18W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Meera Narayan
7W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Anne Hurley
14W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.07
MALLORY LOWE
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Gilbert
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Regan Moore
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.