Teams

LTC RED

2022 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.17 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-10vs HRCA BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesPat Cantrell / Stella Madrid vs Carol Avery / Fauna MacKillip3-6, 3-6
2022-06-06vs LEBTC REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesStella Madrid / Angela Fulcher vs Kellie Naclerio / Catherine Zeberlein5-7, 0-6
2022-06-03vs BCST PURPLEWon 30
W#1 DoublesPriscilla Flanders / Susann Feld vs Melissa Zantop / Kimberly Lange7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesStella Madrid / Angela Fulcher vs Michelle Harvey / Kathleen Antony6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJackie Kirby / Ana Law vs Jeanine Martinez / Laurie van Sickle6-1, 6-0
2022-05-27vs KC ORANGELost 01
L#3 DoublesStella Madrid / Nicolle McKinney vs Maria Fischer / Danette Henderson6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2022-05-13vs KC BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichele Dine / Stella Madrid vs Carolyn Wachuta / Laurie Ross6-2, 6-3
2022-05-06vs CK BLUEWon 10
W#3 DoublesStella Madrid / Angela Fulcher vs Kathryn Dann / Kathleen Wilhite6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Kathleen Sumpter
published 3.5
Jackie Kirby
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.48
Stella Madrid
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.26
Kelly Costanzo
published
Ana Law
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Angela Fulcher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Michele Dine
published
Nicolle McKinney
published
Pat Cantrell
published
Priscilla Flanders
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sue Curtin
published
Susann Feld
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Priscilla Flanders + Michele Dine9358% games+2.1% vs expected
Stella Madrid + Pat Cantrell7168% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kathleen Sumpter
71W–28L career · no lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.46
3
Jackie Kirby
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
3
Stella Madrid
61W–80L career · type A · 6 lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.48
Kelly Costanzo
22W–70L career · no lines in 2022
97%3%<1%
2.26
Ana Law
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Angela Fulcher
7W–13L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Michele Dine
12W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nicolle McKinney
26W–36L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Pat Cantrell
12W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Priscilla Flanders
10W–5L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Sue Curtin
32W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Susann Feld
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.