Teams

SDNC 3.5 CTA@ RA 9AM/ Bristol

2021 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SDNC · SDNC - Women - 3.5 WD Flight 3D

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-05-10vs SDNC 3.5 LLW La Costa / ZielinskiWon 10
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Benke / Donna Tucker vs Rachel Ficara / Deanna Murphy7-6, 6-2
2021-05-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesTeresa Butler / Onay Havens vs Maryann Breed / Grace Friebe6-4, 7-5
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Benke / Onay Havens vs Yolanda Christensen / Lyn van Haght6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Benke / Donna Tucker vs Kelson Splavec / Jennifer van Riet4-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Benke / Donna Tucker vs Karen Rose / Joanne White1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-03-22vs SDNC 3.5 Santaluz 10:30AM/ UribeWon 10
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Benke / Donna Tucker vs Bella Pfefferman / Tammy Pham6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women - 3.5 WD Flight 3D have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Onay Havens
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Kellie Hobbick
published
3.34
Ping Chen
published
3.31
Emily Adamiec
published 3.5
3.24
Vicky Benito
published 3.5
3.18
Christine Bristol
published 3.5
3.18
Mie Bennett
published
3.11
Suzanne Benke
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.95
Donna Tucker
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vicky Benito + Onay Havens19757% games+6.5% vs expected
Donna Tucker + Suzanne Benke044 matchesnot enough data
Emily Adamiec + Onay Havens123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Onay Havens
79W–38L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
3.39
Kellie Hobbick
4W–1L career · no lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
3.37
Ping Chen
14W–11L career · no lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.34
3.5
Emily Adamiec
67W–51L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Vicky Benito
51W–29L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Christine Bristol
4W–5L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.18
Mie Bennett
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Suzanne Benke
30W–19L career · 5 lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
3.11
3.5
Donna Tucker
0W–4L career · no lines in 2021
65%35%<1%
2.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.