Teams

WALLENBERG PK CM8.5A

2023 COMBO · Men 8.5

17 players · average NTRP 4.12 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-10-04vs BAY CLUB COURTSIDE CM8.5AWon 10
W#2 DoublesEric Tsai / Andrew Ma vs Greg Lawler / Patrick Oakes7-6, 6-1
2023-09-26vs SILVER CREEK CM8.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesChuong Truong / Andrew Ma vs Sanjeev Bhanot / Adam Foley6-2, 6-1
2023-09-14Won 10
W#1 DoublesAndrew Ma / Eric Xu vs Juan Castillo / Thomas Nguyen3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.06 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.51
Raymond Uyehara
published
4.39
Eric Xu
published
4.37
Jerry Liang
published
4.30
Edwin Pham
published
4.27
Eric Tsai
published
4.20
Robert Yee
published
3.99
Jaewan Mun
published
3.96
Ricky Duong
published
3.96
3.91
Eric Contreras
published
3.91
David Le
published 4.5
3.82
Chuong Truong
published 4
3.79
Henry Wong
published
3.78
Vladan Popovic
published
3.75
Paul Shin
published
Andrew Ma
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Kevin Rausa
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Yee + Eric Contreras213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Raymond Uyehara
9W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%46%54%
4.51
Eric Xu
30W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
4.39
Jerry Liang
17W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
4.37
Edwin Pham
17W–8L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
4.30
Eric Tsai
16W–9L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
4.27
Robert Yee
22W–1L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
4.20
Jaewan Mun
12W–3L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
3.99
Ricky Duong
11W–4L career · no lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
3.96
4
An-Vincent Nguyen
15W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.96
Eric Contreras
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
73%27%<1%
3.91
4.5
David Le
10W–14L career · no lines in 2023
75%25%<1%
3.91
4
Chuong Truong
21W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.82
Henry Wong
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
Vladan Popovic
23W–20L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
Paul Shin
9W–3L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Andrew Ma
37W–13L career · type M · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kevin Rausa
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.