Teams

Stonebrook

2023 Shenandoah Combo Weekend Women · Shenandoah 6.5 Combo WEEKEND Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.12 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-09-10vs Love BugsWon 10
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Minicucci / Mary Broy vs Ellen Gibbons / Kendra McQuillan6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2023-08-27vs Love BugsSplit 11
W#2 DoublesDesiree Kardashian / Carrie Seifert vs Theresa Manion / Sue Nilsson2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMary Broy / Leslie Lech vs Shannon Leigh / Stephanie Settle4-6, 3-6
2023-08-13vs Love BugsLost 02
L#1 DoublesDesiree Kardashian / Carrie Seifert vs Shannon Leigh / Janet Rathbone5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRobbie Marchant / Mary Broy vs Gabrielle Huthoefer / Lori Huthoefer7-6, 4-6
2023-08-06vs Love BugsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDesiree Kardashian / Elizabeth Minicucci vs Stephanie Kennedy / Brenda Burleson6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMary Saunders / Mary Broy vs Gabrielle Huthoefer / Kelli Munoz2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Shenandoah 6.5 Combo WEEKEND Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Elizabeth Minicucci
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Robbie Marchant
published
3.24
Mary Saunders
published
2.83
Mary Broy
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.78
Heather Saville
published 3
2.63
Shirley McInturff
published
2.42
Desiree Kardashian
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Martha Johnson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Saunders + Elizabeth Minicucci6165% games+3.9% vs expected
Desiree Kardashian + Mary Broy2540% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Minicucci + Mary Broy2345% gamesnot enough data
Heather Saville + Mary Broy213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Elizabeth Minicucci
65W–63L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.33
Robbie Marchant
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.26
Mary Saunders
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
3
Mary Broy
58W–63L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Heather Saville
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
2.78
Shirley McInturff
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
2.63
3
Desiree Kardashian
36W–75L career · 3 lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
2.42
Martha Johnson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.