Teams

HAmick-DUR

2025 Eno River Fall Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over 3.0 Women Evening

4 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-11-24Won 10
W#3 SinglesCecilia Gonzales vs Valerie Williams6-0, 6-1
2025-11-18vs ABoone-TOCHWon 10
W#2 SinglesCecilia Gonzales vs Ann Laros6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-11-05vs MMcCullough-DURLost 01
L#3 SinglesCecilia Gonzales vs Megan McCullough2-6, 2-6
2025-11-04vs WMaxwell-DURWon 10
W#2 SinglesCecilia Gonzales vs Xinwen Zhang6-2, 6-3
2025-10-14vs JPobst-DURWon 10
W#3 SinglesCecilia Gonzales vs Sloane Huntley6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 3.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Halle Amick
published 3
2.96
Lena Basta
published
2.87
Suzanne Hallquist
published
2.69
Cecilia Gonzales
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Halle Amick
14W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Lena Basta
13W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.96
Suzanne Hallquist
2W–17L career · no lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
2.87
3
Cecilia Gonzales
49W–89L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.