Teams

TLSB-BEARDSLEE/WP Tri B

2024 Lake USTA Tri Level Level 18 & Over · Women's Group B 3.0, 3.5 & 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.44 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-08-15vs TLSCL-Clancy/Cornelius Road ParkSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMargaret MacKie / Sharyn Darden vs Barbara Kosior / Linda Dove0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesStacy Beardslee / Kristen Rogers vs Katherine Karnatz / Claudia Burdulis7-6, 6-4
2024-08-14vs TLLWI-Winter/LNRC Tri BLost 12
L#1 DoublesDenise Bost / Patricia Ferguson vs Amy Brandon / Julie Mudge2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesWhitney King / Kathleen Stiffler vs Melissa Smith / Keri Norcross4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesStacy Beardslee / Kristen Rogers vs Christin Darnell / Leslie Crane6-3, 6-3
2024-08-13vs TLJGE-Germinario/Trump Tri BLost 01
L#2 DoublesKathleen Stiffler / Tonya Watson vs Aleah Wolfe / Jenna Germinario0-6, 2-6
2024-07-17vs TLSRE-Reitler/ CSD SPARTAN TRI BWon 10
W#1 DoublesMargaret MacKie / Sharyn Darden vs Patricia Arrowood / Gina Martin6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2024-07-10vs TLJRI-Ritter /JETTON TRI BLost 12
L#1 DoublesSharyn Darden / Margaret MacKie vs Jana Ritter / Kathleen Rissberger1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPatricia Ferguson / Kathleen Stiffler vs Shana Erber / Julie Coughlin6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesStacy Beardslee / Kristen Rogers vs Laura Gottlieb / Kathleen Galloway6-0, 6-1
2024-07-03vs TLKAT-Atkins/Jetton Tri BWon 20
W#1 DoublesMargaret MacKie / Sharyn Darden vs Christine Caruso / Mary Kay Portaro7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristina Mullen / Denise Bost vs Danielle Mikolajczyk / Jennifer Saxton1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-06-26vs LWGO-Goodwin/Bailey Rd Pk Tri B WedSplit 11
W#1 DoublesWhitney King / Christina Mullen vs Donna Strauss / Karime Jankauskas6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKathleen Stiffler / Tonya Watson vs Stacy Foshee / Cindy Mexcur3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 DoublesSharyn Darden / Whitney King vs Jodi Patterson / Leslie Shipley4-6, 3-6
2024-06-12vs TLMM-Murash/River Run Tri BWon 21
W#1 DoublesMargaret MacKie / Sharyn Darden vs Terri Utz / Brooke Harris6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Shelton / Denise Bost vs Elizabeth Bobb / Julie Lyerly1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesStacy Beardslee / Candace Newman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-06-05vs TLEM-Emlong/Kaspar/LNRC TRI BLost 12
W#1 DoublesMargaret MacKie / Sharyn Darden vs Erika Buchholz / Trish Behnke3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPatricia Ferguson / Denise Bost vs Darlene Scripter / Margaret Vermillion2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesStacy Beardslee / Candace Newman vs Caroline Kaspar / Kristy Del Monte1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's Group B 3.0, 3.5 & 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Margaret MacKie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Christina Mullen
published 3.5
3.38
Ann Murphy
published 3.5
3.38
Tonya Watson
published
3.36
Kristen Rogers
published
3.34
Whitney King
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Denise Bost
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Sharyn Darden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Patricia Ferguson
published
2.98
Kathleen Stiffler
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
2.79
Stacy Beardslee
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Sandra Stinson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharyn Darden + Denise Bost51147% games+1.4% vs expected
Margaret MacKie + Sharyn Darden6743% games−18.7% vs expected
Tonya Watson + Whitney King134 matchesnot enough data
Ann Murphy + Kathleen Stiffler123 matchesnot enough data
Stacy Beardslee + Kathleen Stiffler033 matchesnot enough data
Tonya Watson + Kristen Rogers213 matchesnot enough data
Christina Mullen + Kristen Rogers213 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Stiffler + Whitney King123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Margaret MacKie
127W–90L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Christina Mullen
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Ann Murphy
13W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.38
Tonya Watson
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.38
Kristen Rogers
17W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.36
3.5
Whitney King
76W–66L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Denise Bost
205W–139L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Sharyn Darden
53W–69L career · 7 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
Patricia Ferguson
11W–17L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Kathleen Stiffler
152W–161L career · 7 lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
2.98
3
Stacy Beardslee
115W–144L career · 8 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
Sandra Stinson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.