Teams

Oaksmith 3.5 (40+)

2021 Howard-Columbia Adult 40 & Over · Adult 40 & Over Women 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.44 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule13 played
2021-08-02vs Sets in the City (40+)Won 21
L#1 DoublesTammi Molavi / Stephanie Ruskin vs Mary Martin / Amy Dawson6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesElisabeth Garcia-Wade / Kim Neiss vs Julie Snavely / Feliz Steele6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesFarrah O'Colman / Sandy Segrist vs Roslyn Waddy / Stephanie Ahmed6-0, 6-4
2021-07-28vs Super SmashLost 12
W#1 DoublesKim Neiss / Elisabeth Garcia-Wade vs Barbara Wertman / Dawn Collins6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMary Ann Blyth vs Jennifer Nazaire2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesElisa Oaksmith / Missy Burke vs Joy Griffin / Patricia Demme2-6, 5-7
2021-07-20Lost 01
L#3 DoublesStephanie Ruskin / Kim Neiss vs Lee Sachs / Diane Miller2-6, 2-6
2021-07-15vs Rally Girls 3.5 (40+)Won 30
W#1 SinglesSandy Segrist vs GENA CHUNG6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJackie Crispell / Mary Ann Blyth vs Brenda Poore / EnPing Wang6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesStephanie Ruskin / Tammi Molavi vs Leigh Leslie / Ugur Erickson2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-07-06vs SmashedWon 30
W#1 DoublesSandy Segrist / Dionne Miller vs Sanghee Lee / Gina Seyfried3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKim Neiss / Farrah O'Colman vs Angie Norris / Dina Rachuba2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMargaret Asher / Missy Burke vs Kelly Treacy / Flo Wilson6-0, 6-4
2021-06-27vs Happy HittingWon 30
W#1 DoublesTammi Molavi / Sandy Segrist vs Elsie Stines / Kimberly Scott6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKathryn Broadbent / Missy Burke vs Nicole Brizan / Danyelle Taylor6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMary Ann Blyth / Gena Conron vs Nicole Connell / Tina Sarfaraz6-1, 6-1
2021-06-23vs MacAttack 3.5 (40+)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKathryn Broadbent / Missy Burke vs Jennie Kim / Susan Rhee3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesStephanie Ruskin / Valerie Hicks vs Stephanie Richards / Rochelle Porter1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSandy Segrist / Margaret Asher vs Carrie Baumann / Heidi Sung2-6, 3-6
2021-06-15vs Casual Sets (40+)Split 11
L#1 SinglesGena Conron vs Lorra Baker6-1, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSandy Segrist / Dionne Miller vs Helen Lee / Kathleen Stevens6-0, 6-1
2021-06-08Lost 01
L#1 SinglesSandy Segrist vs Erin Kim3-6, 5-7
2021-06-01vs SparksSplit 11
W#1 DoublesStephanie Ruskin / Tammi Molavi vs Lisa Paulman / Anne Swartz7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesElisa Oaksmith / Missy Burke vs Denise Buch / Karen Keane3-6, 5-7
2021-05-23vs Shipley (40+)Won 20
W#1 DoublesSandy Segrist / Valerie Hicks vs Trish Shipley / Elizabeth Goldy6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesStephanie Ruskin / Tammi Molavi vs Kelly Murray / Melinda Cunningham6-4, 6-1
2021-05-15vs Vitamin T (40+)Won 10
W#1 DoublesValerie Hicks / Sandy Segrist vs Margaret Sybert / Shelley Swaim6-1, 6-1
2021-05-14vs Ladies of the Net 3.5 (40+)Won 30
W#1 DoublesStephanie Ruskin / Tammi Molavi vs Holly M Beck / Linda Ginsburg6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesSandy Segrist vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMary Ann Blyth / Valerie Hicks vs Renee Plazak / Diane Ruggiero6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Jill Rose
published
3.26
3.20
Missy Burke
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.19
Tammi Molavi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Margaret Asher
published
3.15
Mary Ann Blyth
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.14
Kim Neiss
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.14
Sandy Segrist
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 30% · published 3.5
3.14
Gena Conron
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Monica Targonski
published
2.94
Elisa Oaksmith
published 3.5
2.70
Stephanie Ruskin
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
Valerie Hicks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tammi Molavi + Stephanie Ruskin172048% games−1.1% vs expected
Stephanie Ruskin + Gena Conron131348% games−4.2% vs expected
Tammi Molavi + Gena Conron4356% gamesnot enough data
Kim Neiss + Tammi Molavi033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Rose
49W–17L career · no lines in 2021
<1%63%37%
3.96
3.5
Elisabeth Garcia-Wade
9W–5L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Missy Burke
33W–33L career · 5 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Tammi Molavi
115W–132L career · 6 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
Margaret Asher
7W–9L career · no lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Mary Ann Blyth
45W–88L career · 4 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Kim Neiss
40W–62L career · 4 lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Sandy Segrist
116W–94L career · 10 lines in 2021
14%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Gena Conron
86W–123L career · 2 lines in 2021
14%85%<1%
3.14
Monica Targonski
3W–2L career · no lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Elisa Oaksmith
2W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2021
67%33%<1%
2.94
3
Stephanie Ruskin
141W–155L career · 7 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
2.70
Valerie Hicks
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.