Teams

SD 4.0 ECCTA 9AM/ Galan

2021 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD · SD - Men - 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.25 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-05-23vs SD 4.0 Mtn View 9AM/ HerreraWon 10
W#2 DoublesPaul Minifee / Jed Galan vs Anourack Soukhaseum / James Pele6-3, 6-2
2021-05-16Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJed Galan / Kevin Mallery vs Ryan Hughes / Scott Rath4-6, 3-6
2021-04-11Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJed Galan / Ben Hogan vs Jesus Osuna-Yajimovich / William Cruz2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAntonio Hernandez / Sakda Kethdy vs Andy Tran / John Carter3-6, 4-6
2021-03-28vs SD 4.0 Lake Murray TC 9AM/ HillWon 10
W#1 DoublesJed Galan / Antonio Hernandez vs Seth Hill / Ryan Hughes7-5, 6-2
2021-03-21vs SD 4.0 Del Cerro/ ChannickWon 10
W#1 DoublesSakda Kethdy / Craig Noll vs Joao Allende / John Faulkner6-2, 6-3
2021-03-14Lost 01
L#1 SinglesKevin Mallery vs Prakash Holalkere6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Men - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ben Hogan
published 4.5
4.23
Antonio Hernandez
published 4.5
4.14
Francisco Loayza
published 4.5
3.96
Peter Yuen
published
3.92
Craig Noll
published 4.5
3.87
Jed Galan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.79
Sakda Kethdy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Benson Wong
published 4
Kevin Mallery
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Paul Minifee
published
Lucas Heilman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jed Galan + Sakda Kethdy224 matchesnot enough data
Jed Galan + Kevin Mallery033 matchesnot enough data
Sakda Kethdy + Kevin Mallery033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ben Hogan
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Antonio Hernandez
12W–3L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Francisco Loayza
6W–8L career · no lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
4.14
Peter Yuen
4W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%62%38%
3.96
4.5
Craig Noll
0W–8L career · no lines in 2021
72%28%<1%
3.92
4
Jed Galan
161W–84L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%84%15%
3.87
4
Sakda Kethdy
75W–55L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Benson Wong
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Kevin Mallery
63W–40L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Paul Minifee
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.72
Lucas Heilman
9W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.