Teams

FTA40A/Riverside/Clator

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over - FTA - Saturday · 3.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.40 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-05vs FTA40A/Cardinal/ClevelandLost 14
L#1 DoublesEdie Clator / Justine Allen vs Crystal Cleveland / Susan Krzeminski1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesCarol Kooistra vs Jeanette ELLIOTT3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLiz Darrow / Catherine Hunt vs Caroline Carter / Renee Yarbrough3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Spotts / Sally Vaquero vs Kimberly Pearigen / Britanny A ROOD3-6, 3-6
W#4 DoublesMarieta Borillo / Kim Dailey vs Paola White / Kellar Rogers6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-03-29vs FTA40A/ACACSportsclub/SeguraWon 32
W#1 DoublesLiz Darrow / Catherine Hunt vs Tina Underwood / Michelle Scott4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesEdie Clator vs Tracie Segura6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Spotts / Sally Vaquero vs Stephanie Tolbert / Maria Miller6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLaura Carlson / Kim Dailey vs Kelly Lewis / Sheila Reitler4-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesJulia Mullen / Christina Pompey vs Stephanie Painter / Misela Garcia3-6, 2-6
2025-03-08vs FTA40A/GCC/HillLost 05
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Spotts / Catherine Hunt vs Andrea Bryan / Carrie Ann Twedt6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCarol Kooistra vs Shelly Walker4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJustine Allen / Sally Vaquero vs Ali Hill / Tracy O'Shea5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Carlson / Kathryn Wiater vs Ann Ellison / Drake Gribbin3-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesChristina Pompey / Kim Dailey vs Lauren Demosthenes / Elizabeth Philmon2-6, 2-6
2025-03-01vs FTA40A/Brookstone/TrosoLost 23
W#1 DoublesLiz Darrow / Catherine Hunt vs Amy Lee / Pamela Brooks7-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJustine Allen vs Kara Powder5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Spotts / Sally Vaquero vs Deana Fisher / Doni Willmering6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLaura Carlson / Marieta Borillo vs Candice Diggins / Jennifer Moran4-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesJody Rofelson / Kathryn Wiater vs Annette Curin / Melodee Rosopa1-6, 1-6
2025-02-22vs FTA40A/SpauldingFarm/CooperLost 13
L#1 DoublesElizabeth McCollum / Liz Darrow vs Naomi Kozawa / Mitsuko Kashikura2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesCarol Kooistra vs Sonya Bright5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSally Vaquero / Edie Clator vs Patricia Surles / Gina Pelino6-1, 6-2
L#4 DoublesKathryn Wiater / Kim Dailey vs Dorelly Herford / Gina Carter5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Edie Clator
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.49
Elizabeth McCollum
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Liz Darrow
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.29
Justine Allen
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Catherine Hunt
published 3.5
3.21
Carol Kooistra
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Marieta Borillo
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Suzanne Spotts
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.05
Sally Vaquero
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.02
Julia Mullen
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Kim Dailey
usually #4 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.75
Christina Pompey
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jody Rofelson
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Kathryn Wiater
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Liz Darrow + Suzanne Spotts2450% games+7.4% vs expected
Justine Allen + Edie Clator9355% games−2.9% vs expected
Liz Darrow + Edie Clator3262% gamesnot enough data
Edie Clator + Elizabeth McCollum404 matchesnot enough data
Liz Darrow + Catherine Hunt303 matchesnot enough data
Justine Allen + Elizabeth McCollum303 matchesnot enough data
Sally Vaquero + Suzanne Spotts213 matchesnot enough data
Suzanne Spotts + Elizabeth McCollum213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Edie Clator
46W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Elizabeth McCollum
50W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
Liz Darrow
28W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
Justine Allen
28W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Catherine Hunt
8W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Carol Kooistra
6W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
Marieta Borillo
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.16
Suzanne Spotts
38W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.15
Sally Vaquero
9W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
Julia Mullen
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.02
Kim Dailey
7W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Christina Pompey
11W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
Jody Rofelson
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kathryn Wiater
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.