Teams

IE-MTC-Volley Girls-Jeanne Shelter

2023 USTA Adult 40 & Over - IE · IE Women 3.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#1 DoublesDenise Standish / Teresa Festorazzi vs Jennifer Denson / Danette Conlin6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2023-03-12vs IE-CCCC-Monette SchwartzWon 10
W#2 DoublesDenise Standish / Teresa Festorazzi vs Mary Anderson / Jennifer Hughey6-1, 6-2
2023-03-05vs IE LLW APTC/ Russo-PereyraLost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrea Van Soest / Teresa Festorazzi vs Elizabeth Curtiss / Dorothy Geiger4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2023-02-26vs IE-CCCC-Monette SchwartzWon 10
W#1 DoublesTeresa Festorazzi / Denise Radogna vs Kam Jara / Mary Anderson6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Andrea Van Soest
published 4
3.47
Denise Radogna
published 3.5
3.40
3.26
Michelle Roe
published
2.77
Stacy Westfall
published
2.77
Teresa Festorazzi
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3
2.74
Jennivieve Randolph
published
2.73
Denise Standish
published 3
Jeanne Shelter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denise Radogna + Rosa Galeas-Vamadeva314 matchesnot enough data
Rosa Galeas-Vamadeva + Michelle Roe134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrea Van Soest
33W–38L career · type A · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
3.5
Denise Radogna
10W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.47
Rosa Galeas-Vamadeva
12W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.40
Michelle Roe
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.26
Stacy Westfall
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Teresa Festorazzi
58W–41L career · 9 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
Jennivieve Randolph
7W–11L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Denise Standish
22W–20L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
Jeanne Shelter
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.