Teams

WI Adult 18&O 3.5 W GML Princeton Kuzmanovic

2022 WI Adult 18 & Over · WI Adult 18 & Over 3.5 (Eve) Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.38 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesSonja Devcic / Sadie Podewils vs Lisa Ellegard / Lee Heinrich0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMelanie Kuzmanovic / Cissy Buchta vs Sarah Langerman / Tami Vincent0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMelissa Breitzman vs Cathy Thum6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJeane Schell / Cathy Rozewicz vs Sara Feider / Danica Olson6-7, 4-6
L#1 DoublesJoyce Coury / Beth LambrechtScasny vs Nicole Hesse / Lianne Froemming3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSawnie Buehl vs Kathy Mueller3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJeane Schell / Sadie Podewils vs Margaret Duffy / Jenny Kangas4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesBrenda Loya vs Margaret Hayes3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDagmar Tatlock / Sonja Devcic vs Jan Wade / Kathy Hennig2-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesSadie Podewils / Jeane Schell vs Susan Schmidt / Sarah Griffin3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSawnie Buehl vs Colleen Hutt5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMelanie Kuzmanovic / Cissy Buchta vs Kelly Kolo / Deanna Ritter6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesBrenda Loya vs Cindy Chippindale4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCathy Rozewicz / Joyce Coury vs Vicky Schaechterle / Laura Cruse4-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesMelanie Kuzmanovic / Cissy Buchta vs Andrea Gromacki / Jennifer Hale4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSawnie Buehl vs Alyssa Markuson1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJoyce Coury / Dagmar Tatlock vs Jeanne Trowbridge / Katherine Bohrman3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesMelissa Breitzman vs C H1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBeth LambrechtScasny / Jeane Schell vs Katie Kennedy / Jeri Spangler6-4, 6-2
W#1 DoublesMelanie Kuzmanovic / Cissy Buchta vs Cindy Kowis / Brittany Sugden3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoyce Coury / Sadie Podewils vs Pamela Casey / Kathleen Cooper6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBrenda Loya / Cathy Rozewicz vs Kristen Field / Aimee Kohn1-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesMelanie Kuzmanovic / Sonja Devcic vs Peggy Pomplin / Patricia Hanz6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesSawnie Buehl vs Megan Hambrook6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJeane Schell / Sadie Podewils vs Jennifer Alberti / Paula Bergquist7-5, 7-6
L#2 SinglesBrenda Loya vs Audrey Johnson0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCathy Rozewicz / Melissa Breitzman vs Dianne Carr / Carol Zembinski1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 DoublesJoyce Coury / Dagmar Tatlock vs Leah Damron / Heather Szerbat6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesSawnie Buehl vs Cathy Thum6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSonja Devcic / Melanie Kuzmanovic vs Lisa Ellegard / Tami Vincent3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesBrenda Loya vs Suzanne Thomas2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJeane Schell / Sadie Podewils vs Lee Heinrich / Sara Feider2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 DoublesMelanie Kuzmanovic / Sonja Devcic vs Nicole Hesse / Mary Berg3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSawnie Buehl vs Kathy Mueller2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCissy Buchta / Beth LambrechtScasny vs Margaret Duffy / Wendy Schneller6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMelissa Breitzman / Cathy Rozewicz vs Kathy Hennig / Jenny Kangas3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings21 teams · WI Adult 18 & Over 3.5 (Eve) Women
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Melanie Kuzmanovic
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.54
Beth LambrechtScasny
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.37
Joyce Coury
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.27
Cissy Buchta
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.05
Sadie Podewils
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.96
Sawnie Buehl
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Brenda Loya
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.60
Cathy Rozewicz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jeane Schell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Melissa Breitzman
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Sonja Devcic
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth LambrechtScasny + Joyce Coury12558% games+7.0% vs expected
Melanie Kuzmanovic + Beth LambrechtScasny13364% games+6.9% vs expected
Melanie Kuzmanovic + Sonja Devcic18560% games+6.5% vs expected
Melanie Kuzmanovic + Joyce Coury13460% games+3.8% vs expected
Cathy Rozewicz + Melissa Breitzman4743% games+2.1% vs expected
Sadie Podewils + Melanie Kuzmanovic8754% games−2.8% vs expected
Melanie Kuzmanovic + Cissy Buchta5455% games−3.5% vs expected
Sawnie Buehl + Cissy Buchta3446% games−3.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Melanie Kuzmanovic
151W–72L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%19%81%
3.61
3.5
Beth LambrechtScasny
138W–93L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Joyce Coury
120W–88L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Cissy Buchta
39W–43L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Sadie Podewils
48W–47L career · 6 lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.05
3.5
Sawnie Buehl
47W–69L career · 6 lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
2.96
3
Brenda Loya
11W–45L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Cathy Rozewicz
37W–75L career · 5 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
2.60
Jeane Schell
28W–20L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Melissa Breitzman
7W–14L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sonja Devcic
41W–34L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.