Teams

Simons Bliss

2025 One Doubles · 4.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.67 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Kim Stevens
published 4
3.44
Dory Simons
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Desiree Bliss
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2025-08-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesDesiree Bliss / ANN MILLER vs Timothea Barnatan / Laura Rundle6-2, 6-3
2025-08-06Lost 01
L#1 DoublesElisa Landers / Dory Simons vs Christy Grisham / Mary Klinger6-2, 6-3
2025-08-02Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDesiree Bliss / ANN MILLER vs Rie Sasakawa / Flor Harrigan6-2, 6-2
2025-08-01Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDesiree Bliss / ANN MILLER vs Kristin Spear / Valyrie Ingram6-4, 6-1
2025-07-30Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDesiree Bliss / ANN MILLER vs Catherine Crosby / Mary Hlady1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-07-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesElisa Landers / Dory Simons vs Brooke Moffenbeier / Launi Smith6-4, 6-4
2025-07-09Lost 01
L#1 DoublesElisa Landers / Dory Simons vs Hong Huynh / Shannon Roarke6-0, 6-4
2025-06-23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDory Simons / Elisa Landers vs Jennifer Petersen / Alma Siri6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Kim Stevens
56W–44L career
not enough data
3.5
Dory Simons
65W–31L career
0%91%9%
3.44
3.5
Desiree Bliss
65W–35L career
0%95%5%
3.39

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.