Teams

Pair Jordans

2024 Washington D.C. Adult 40 & Over · Washington D.C. Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-03-24vs Set2WinLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnne Elliot / Tennille Goff vs Khanh Le / Meg Tronquet5-7, 1-3
L#1 SinglesSarah Wiederkehr vs Hannah Yoo0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesChristine Hopkins / Jessie Salpeter vs LaShonne Barnes / Tamara Davis7-5, 5-3
2024-03-17vs PINEY RUNLost 03
L#1 DoublesEve Pandit / Jessie Salpeter vs Julie Morris / Mona Mahmoud2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesTiffany Malloy vs Kris Morris1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTennille Goff / Grace Kim vs Belinda Oh / Vicky White Hall3-6, 0-6
2024-03-09vs Anderson & AndersonLost 03
L#1 DoublesJessie Salpeter / Tennille Goff vs Deanne Iverson / Donna Stewart3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSarah Wiederkehr vs Irena Bucci1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSamriti Malik / Tiffany Malloy vs Sylvia Okala / Valerie Ciccone1-6, 2-6
2024-02-25vs Anderson & AndersonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesChristine Hopkins / Eve Pandit vs Susan Velasco / Valerie Ciccone7-5, 3-3
L#2 DoublesSarah Wiederkehr / Anne Elliot vs Donna Stewart / Sylvia Okala5-7, 3-4
2024-02-17vs Set2WinLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristine Hopkins / Tennille Goff vs LaShonne Barnes / Sarah Milsom2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesTiffany Malloy vs Hannah Yoo2-6, 4-5
W#2 DoublesJessie Salpeter / Samriti Malik vs Kristin Kahn / Tracy Phillips6-3, 6-3
2024-02-11vs PINEY RUNWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristine Hopkins / Mary Newburn vs Belinda Oh / Julie Morris6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEve Pandit / Tennille Goff vs Novella Bridges / Sarah Shomstein6-2, 6-3
2024-02-04vs Gut InstinctWon 21
L#1 DoublesEve Pandit / Jessie Salpeter vs Stefanie Karp / Gretchen Teel6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMary Newburn vs Sonya Finley6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAnne Elliot / Grace Kim vs Kathleen McGuigan / JoAnn Ward7-6, 1-2
2024-01-21vs Girls Just Want to Have FunWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristine Hopkins / Anne Elliot vs Mary Lynn Shanahan / Fernanda Nicola6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesSarah Wiederkehr vs Silvia Dacci1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesEve Pandit / Grace Kim vs Alexis Feringa / LEEYA MEHTA7-5, 6-3
2024-01-14vs LoVVLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristine Hopkins / Anne Elliot vs Erica Cruickshank / Natasha Rones1-6, 6-5
L#1 SinglesTennille Goff vs Anjali Garg3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Wiederkehr / Tiffany Malloy vs Andaiye Hamilton / Claris Brock2-6, 0-6
2024-01-07vs Backhanded ComplimentsLost 03
L#1 DoublesJessie Salpeter / Mary Newburn vs Keera Morrish / Pamela Gelfond5-7, 3-5
L#1 SinglesTennille Goff vs Elena Molchanova2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGrace Kim / Tiffany Malloy vs Adrienne Rosenbaum / Amy Cahoon2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Washington D.C. Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Mary Newburn
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.49
Eve Pandit
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.35
Anne Elliot
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.29
Christine Hopkins
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.15
Tiffany Malloy
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.14
Adriene Jordan
published 3.5
3.11
Jessie Salpeter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Grace Kim
published
Samriti Malik
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sarah Wiederkehr
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Tennille Goff
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessie Salpeter + Adriene Jordan213 matchesnot enough data
Jessie Salpeter + Christine Hopkins213 matchesnot enough data
Jessie Salpeter + Tennille Goff033 matchesnot enough data
Christine Hopkins + Tennille Goff033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Mary Newburn
119W–56L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%30%70%
3.57
3.5
Eve Pandit
136W–75L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Anne Elliot
9W–15L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Christine Hopkins
10W–21L career · 6 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
Tiffany Malloy
8W–10L career · 5 lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Adriene Jordan
19W–70L career · type S · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Jessie Salpeter
7W–38L career · 6 lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
3.11
Grace Kim
4W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Samriti Malik
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sarah Wiederkehr
3W–15L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tennille Goff
8W–20L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.