Teams

CON:MixedNuts:Rados

2021 NH Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 1

7 players · average NTRP / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-06vs YMCA:Meighan:BrownLost 03
L#1 DoublesJuanita Richard / Jeff Roberge vs Nicole Driscoll / Sean Parr0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPeter Russo / Marta Pedersen vs Tom Meighan / Lara Shilling2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesNina Rados / Zane Stuart vs Peter Mahoney / Julie Chrissis4-6, 5-7
2021-05-30vs MITC:MorisonLost 03
L#1 DoublesEileen Ketcham / Jeff Roberge vs Gloria Morison / Matthew Sordillo4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesNina Rados / Ned Woody vs Cher Barker / Robert Beck6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMarta Pedersen / Charles O'Leary vs Libby Twitchell / David Odland3-6, 0-6
2021-05-23vs K:PorowskiLost 03
L#1 DoublesJames Cassidy / Marie Stevens vs Jessica Bono / Chester Porowski0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Normandin / Barbara Normandin vs Jonathan Evans / Ellen Ryan0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesZane Stuart / Nina Rados vs Scott Herstad / Jacqueline Waldvogel0-6, 0-6
2021-05-16vs EXE:GamacheWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarie Stevens / James Cassidy vs Tracey Gamache / George Aubin6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMarta Pedersen / Charles O'Leary vs Vivien Law / Ben Bailey4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJuanita Richard / Jeff Roberge vs Cynthia Lamarche / Tim Geist6-1, 6-2
2021-05-09vs YMCA:NobertSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMarta Pedersen / Charles O'Leary vs Lisa Nelson / Patrick Botz1-6, 0-2
L#2 DoublesNina Rados / Ned Woody vs Meghan Howell / Philip Keller2-6, 0-6
2021-05-02vs GB:Gerhard:FranzLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarie Stevens / Charles O'Leary vs James Murphy / Mary Siverts1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Normandin / Barbara Normandin vs Athena Kimball / Dan Gelinas2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJuanita Richard / Peter Russo vs Adam Gerhard / Anne Tall6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0 Mixed 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CON:MixedNuts:Rados1541430187
2EXE:Gamache0611734203

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Marta Pedersen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.04
Juanita Richard
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.93
Marie Stevens
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Barbara Normandin
published
Jeff Roberge
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Nina Rados
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Robert Normandin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marta Pedersen
33W–45L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.36
Juanita Richard
55W–95L career · 3 lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.04
Marie Stevens
55W–83L career · 3 lines in 2021
70%30%<1%
2.93
Barbara Normandin
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jeff Roberge
2W–9L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Nina Rados
16W–38L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Robert Normandin
25W–18L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.