Teams

Marsh Landing - Saig

2021 Duval Adult 40 & Over - Men · 4.5 Adult 40 & Over Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-02-28Won 10
W#2 DoublesMichael Marrou / Billy Burgess vs Nicholas Rogers / Kevin Crismond6-4, 6-3
2021-02-27vs Eagle Harbor - WalshWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichael Marrou / Chris Guzewich vs Joseph Massaro / David Phillips6-2, 6-1
2021-02-20vs Oakleaf - HartleyWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichael Marrou / Nathan Fabrick vs Brad Mossman / David Prichard6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLouis Saig / William VanOrmer vs Raman Saigal / Rudy Ignacio6-3, 6-4
2021-02-13vs Duval - San Jose - MorganWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichael Marrou / Martin Luytjes vs Eric Berzsenyi / Rick Vach6-2, 6-0
2021-01-31vs Eagle Harbor - WalshWon 20
W#2 DoublesMichael Marrou / Tom Salmon vs Joseph Massaro / Kevin Beall6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLouis Saig / Chris Guzewich vs Curt Cavins / David Phillips6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2021-01-30vs Julington Creek - GrahamWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Marrou / Greg Nydick vs Matt Wentzel / Carl Scott6-2, 6-4
2021-01-09vs Duval - San Jose - MorganLost 02
L#1 DoublesLouis Saig / Chris Guzewich vs Bill Orr / Richard Redick1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Marrou / Nathan Fabrick vs Kenneth Wood / Brian DeAlexandris4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult 40 & Over Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.18 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Greg Nydick
published 5
4.52
Nathan Fabrick
published
4.40
Michael Marrou
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
4.25
Onke Murdono
published
Andy Tynan
published 4.5
Daniel Nebus
published 4.5
4.17
Billy Burgess
published 4.5
4.08
Louis Saig
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.01
William VanOrmer
published
3.84
Martin Luytjes
published
Rahim Ryan Khan
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Greg Nydick
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Nathan Fabrick
6W–1L career · no lines in 2021
<1%45%55%
4.52
Michael Marrou
96W–30L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%77%23%
4.40
Onke Murdono
5W–8L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Andy Tynan
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Daniel Nebus
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Billy Burgess
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
10%90%1%
4.17
Louis Saig
105W–102L career · 3 lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
4.08
William VanOrmer
5W–3L career · no lines in 2021
47%53%<1%
4.01
4
James Smiechewicz
15W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.84
Martin Luytjes
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Rahim Ryan Khan
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.